Fortinet FortiClient EMS Vulnerability A Deep Dive into and Bridging the Gap in Cybersecurity with ASPM and Vulnerability Management

Attack Surface Posture Management (ASPM), Vulnerability Management, CVE-2023-48788, SQL Injection, Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Threat Intelligence, Shadowserver


Attack Surface Posture Management , Vulnerability Management, CVE-2023-48788, SQL Injection, Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Cybersecurity, Endpoint Management Solution, Remote Code Execution, Secure Coding Practices, Digital Defense, Cyber Threat Mitigation, Security Patching, Network Security, IT Infrastructure Protection, Encrypted Communications, Hacker Prevention, Database Security, Input Validation, Threat Intelligence, Cyber Attack Response

 Attack Surface and Posture Management (ASPM) alongside vulnerability management stand as twin pillars essential for fortifying cybersecurity defences. With the recent discovery of CVE-2023-48788, a critical SQL Injection vulnerability within Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Fortinet has released an official advisory that highlights the importance of updates at scale and vulnerability management practices.

The Case of CVE-2023-48788

CVE-2023-48788 is a stark reminder of the persistent threat posed by SQL Injection vulnerabilities. Identified in the Fortinet FortiClient EMS, a platform designed to manage endpoint security, this vulnerability allowed attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially leading to data theft, unauthorized access, and remote code execution.

This vulnerability is particularly concerning because it affects a security tool itself, highlighting that no entity is immune to cybersecurity threats. The issue was rooted in the improper sanitization of user-supplied inputs in database queries, a common cause behind SQL Injection vulnerabilities.

Vulnerability Details for CVE-2023-48788  

Date: 24/MAR/24

Class: Sql injection

CWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707

ATT&CK: T1505

Local: No

Remote: Yes

Availability: No

Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 0.00091

EPSS Percentile: 0.37697

CISA KEV: No

Vulncheck Kev: No

Exploitation of CVE-2023-48788 

Attack Surface Posture Management, CVE-2023-48788, SQL Injection, Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Threat Intelligence, Shadowserver

Credit Shadowserver 

The vulnerability has active exploitation in the wild and POC / exploit publicly available.  

Note the vulnerability leverage an improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’) type [CWE-89] in FortiClientEMS may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests

System Affected by CVE-2023-48788 

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’) threat [CWE-89] in FortiClientEMS may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests.

VersionAffectedSolution
FortiClientEMS 7.27.2.0 through 7.2.2Upgrade to 7.2.3 or above
FortiClientEMS 7.07.0.1 through 7.0.10Upgrade to 7.0.11 or above

Virtual Patch named “FG-VD-54509.0day:FortiClientEMS.DAS.SQL.Injection” is available in FMWP db update 27.750

Exploitation details of CVE-2023-48788 FortiClient EMS 

The Fortinet EMS is installed in the endpoint devices, and a simple SQL command could lead to remote code execution

Note the RCE is one of the major attack methods identified by CISA in the top 12 top exploited vulnerabilities for a full overview: https://phoenix.security/what-is-cisa-kev-main/ 

Attack Surface Posture Management (ASPM), Vulnerability Management, CVE-2023-48788, SQL Injection, Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Threat Intelligence, Shadowserver, CISA KEV, RCE

For the purposes of understanding this vulnerability, FortiClient EMS consists the following components:

  • FmcDaemon.exe – The main service responsible for communicating with enrolled clients. By default, this service listens on port 8013 for incoming client connections.
  • FCTDas.exe – The Data Access Server responsible for translating requests from various other server components into SQL requests. This service interacts with the Microsoft SQL Server database.
  • One or more endpoint clients – These clients communicate with the FmcDaemon on the server (by default tcp/8013)

To convert the SQL injection issue into remote code execution, the researcher team used the built-in xp_cmdshell functionality of Microsoft SQL Server. Initially, the database was not configured to run the xp_cmdshell command, however it was trivially enabled with a few other SQL statements. The POC we are releasing only confirms the threat by using a simple SQL injection without xp_cmdshell. Altering the POC is necessary to enable RCE.

Attack Surface Posture Management (ASPM), Vulnerability Management, CVE-2023-48788, SQL Injection, Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Exploit Evidence

Understanding ASPM and Vulnerability Management

Attack Surface and Posture Management (ASPM) is a holistic approach to cybersecurity, focusing on the continuous discovery, monitoring, and securing of all known and unknown assets across an organization’s digital estate. It’s about having a 360-degree view of your organization’s security posture and identifying weaknesses before attackers do.

Vuln Management, on the other hand, is a critical component of ASPM, involving the identification, prioritization, and remediation of vulnerabilities. It’s a cycle that ensures vulnerabilities are not just discovered but are also analyzed in the context of the organization’s overall security posture and remediated in a timely manner.

Mitigating CVE-2023-48788: A Multifaceted Approach

The mitigation of CVE-2023-48788 required a multifaceted approach, starting from the immediate application of patches provided by Fortinet, to a broader reassessment of security practices surrounding ASPM and vulnerability management.

  • Immediate Patching: Fortinet quickly released patches to address the vulnerability, underscoring the importance of timely updates in vulnerability management.
  • Enhanced Input Validation: At the development level, enhancing input validation mechanisms to ensure that all user-supplied data is sanitized before processing can prevent similar vulnerabilities.
  • Regular Scanning and Assessment: Organizations must adopt regular scanning and assessment routines as part of their ASPM strategy to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities proactively.
  • Security Awareness and Training: Educating developers about secure coding practices and the risks associated with SQL Injection can reduce the incidence of such vulnerabilities.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Implementing continuous monitoring tools to detect unusual activities indicative of exploitation attempts is crucial for early detection and response.

Looking Forward: Strengthening ASPM and Vulnerability Management

The incident with CVE-2023-48788 brings to light several key lessons for strengthening ASPM and vulnerability management practices:

  • Automation in Discovery and Remediation: Leveraging automation tools can enhance the efficiency and comprehensiveness of discovering assets and vulnerabilities.
  • Prioritization Based on Context: Vulnerabilities should be prioritized based on their context within the organization’s overall security posture, focusing remediation efforts where they are most needed.
  • Collaboration Across Teams: A collaborative approach, involving IT, security, and development teams, is essential for a holistic cybersecurity posture.
  • Leveraging Threat Intelligence: Integrating threat intelligence into ASPM practices can provide insights into emerging threats and vulnerabilities, guiding proactive defense strategies.

Conclusion

The revelation of CVE-2023-48788 within Fortinet FortiClient EMS serves as a critical reminder of the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. It underscores the importance of robust ASPM and vulnerability management practices in identifying, managing, and mitigating vulnerabilities. As organizations navigate through the complexities of digital security, the integration of comprehensive ASPM strategies with vigilant vulnerability management will be paramount in safeguarding against the multitude of threats that loom in the digital ether.

In closing, while the technical intricacies of managing cybersecurity are vast, it’s sometimes the basics that bolster the defenses — a notion as true in cybersecurity as it is in building a fortress. And remember, in the realm of cybersecurity, complacency is the enemy’s best friend. Let’s stay vigilant, proactive, and always a step ahead of the threats.

How Phoenix Security Can Help

attack graph, phoenix security

Phoenix Security ASPM helps organizations identify and trace which systems have vulnerabilities, understanding the relation between code and cloud. One of the significant challenges in securing applications is knowing where software like jet brain is installed and how could impact the whole organization. ASPM – Vulnerability management tools can help scale your vulnerability management and identify vulnerable instances of Forticlient ESM, mapping out where it is deployed across the organization. This information is crucial for targeted security measures and efficient patch management. Phoenix Security’s robust Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) system is adept at not just managing, but preempting the exploitation of vulnerabilities through its automated identification system. This system prioritises critical vulnerabilities, ensuring teams can address the most pressing threats first, optimising resource allocation and remediation efforts.

Attack Surface Posture Management (ASPM), Vulnerability Management, CVE-2023-48788, SQL Injection, Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Exploit Evidence

The Role of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM):

ASPM is vital in managing and securing applications like those built with Apache Struts. It involves continuous assessment, monitoring, and improvement of the security posture of applications. ASPM tools can:

  1. Identify and Track Struts Components: Locate where FortiClient EMS are located within the application infrastructure.
  2. VM Management: Detect known vulnerabilities in FortiClient EMS and prioritize them for remediation.
  3. Configuration Monitoring: Ensure FortiClient EMS configurations adhere to best security practices.
  4. Compliance: Check if the usage of Fortinet FortiClient EMS aligns with relevant cybersecurity regulations and standards.
Attack Surface Posture Management (ASPM), Vulnerability Management, CVE-2023-48788,

By leveraging Phoenix Security, you not only unravel the potential threats but also take a significant stride in VM management, ensuring your application security remains up to date and focuses on the key vulnerabilities.

Get in control of your Application Security posture and Vulnerability management

Previous Issues of Vulnerability Weekly


Other Useful resources

Data Visualization of vulnerabilities in the wild


Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
The team at Phoenix Security pleased to bring you another set of new application security (ASPM) features and improvements for vulnerability management across application and cloud security engines. This release builds on top of previous releases with key additions and progress across multiple areas of the platform. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Enhancements • New Weighted Asset Risk Formula – Refined risk aggregation for tailored vulnerability management. • Auto-Approval of Risk Exceptions – Accelerate mitigation by automating security approvals. • Enhanced Risk Explorer & Business Unit Insights – Monitor and analyze risk exposure by business units for better prioritization. Vulnerability & Asset Management • Link Findings to Existing Tickets – Seamless GitHub, ServiceNow, and Azure DevOps integration. • Multi-Finding Ticketing for ADO – Group multiple vulnerabilities in a single ticket for better workflow management. • Filter by Business Unit, CWE, Ownership, and Deployment Environment – Target vulnerabilities with precision using advanced filtering. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Security Enhancements • Cyber Threat Intelligence Premium – Access 128,000+ exploits for better exploitability and fixability metrics. • SBOM, Container SBOM & Open Source Artifact Analysis – Conduct deep security analysis with reachability insights. • Enhanced Lacework Container Management – Fetch and analyze running container details for better security reporting. • REST API Enhancements – Use asset tags for automated deployments and streamline security processes. Other Key Updates • CVE & CWE Columns Added – Compare vulnerabilities more effectively. • Custom Status Management for Findings – Personalize security workflows with custom status configurations. • Impact & Risk Explorer Side Panel – Gain heatmap-based insights into vulnerability distribution and team risk impact. 🚀 Stay ahead of vulnerabilities, optimize risk assessment, and enhance security efficiency with Phoenix Security’s latest features! 🚀
Alfonso Eusebio
Discover CVE-2025-30066 tj-actions/changed-files GitHub Action has been compromised, exposing secrets in CI/CD pipelines and posing a major software supply chain security risk. Attackers injected malicious code into all versions (V1–V45), repointing existing tags to a compromised commit that exfiltrated credentials via GitHub Actions logs. Immediate remediation is required—organizations must scan their repositories, rotate secrets, and replace the action to mitigate risk. Learn how Phoenix Security’s ASPM can automate threat detection and enhance GitHub Actions security.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO