Critical Exploit CVE-2024-3400 Vulnerability Leveraging UVM, CTEM and ASPM to Remediate in this Palo Alto Exploit

palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection
palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection, cvss 10, Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability, Zero-Day Exploit, Cyber Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Unified Vulnerability Management (UVM), Advanced Security Posture Management (ASPM)

A recent discovery, on April 10 2024, by a research group has identified zero-day exploitation of a vulnerability found within the GlobalProtect feature of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS at one of its network security monitoring (NSM) customers, recently published by CISA in CISA KEV. Check this article on the details for CVE-2024-3400 and how to track remediation.

The threat actor, exploiting the vulnerability, now named under the alias UTA0218, was able to remotely exploit the firewall device, create a reverse shell, and download further tools onto the device. This is an entry point for future exploitation and penetration of the network. 

palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection, cvss 10, Palo Alto Networks Timeline

Image timeline AI generated

Despite being present in CISA and not in KEV the vulnerability is currently unpatched. Patches are expected to be available by Sunday, April 14, 2024.

Note: Palo Alto Networks customers are only vulnerable if they are using PAN-OS 10.2, PAN-OS 11.0, and/or PAN-OS 11.1 firewalls with the configurations for both GlobalProtect gateway and device telemetry enabled.

palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection, affected versions,Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability

CISA in CISA KEV has promptly released a statement: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2024/04/12/palo-alto-networks-releases-guidance-vulnerability-pan-os-cve-2024-3400 

Get a free assessment and remediation guidance

Patch/Fix CVE-2024-3400 for Palo Alto

Palo Alto releases a patch for PAN-OS 10.2.9-h1, PAN-OS 11.0.4-h1, PAN-OS 11.1.2-h3, and in all later PAN-OS versions.

Hotfixes for other commonly deployed maintenance releases will also be available to address this issue. Please see the details below for ETAs regarding the upcoming hotfixes.PAN-OS 10.2:


- 10.2.9-h1 (Released 4/14/24)
- 10.2.8-h3 (ETA: 4/15/24)
- 10.2.7-h8 (ETA: 4/15/24)
- 10.2.6-h3 (ETA: 4/15/24)
- 10.2.5-h6 (ETA: 4/16/24)
- 10.2.3-h13 (ETA: 4/17/24)
- 10.2.1-h2 (ETA: 4/17/24)
- 10.2.2-h5 (ETA: 4/18/24)
- 10.2.0-h3 (ETA: 4/18/24)
- 10.2.4-h16 (ETA: 4/19/24)

PAN-OS 11.0:
- 11.0.4-h1 (Released 4/14/24)
- 11.0.3-h10 (ETA: 4/15/24)
- 11.0.2-h4 (ETA: 4/16/24)
- 11.0.1-h4 (ETA: 4/17/24)
- 11.0.0-h3 (ETA: 4/18/24)

PAN-OS 11.1:
- 11.1.2-h3 (Released 4/14/24)
- 11.1.1-h1 (ETA: 4/16/24)
- 11.1.0-h3 (ETA: 4/17/24)

Workaround for CVE-2024-3400 by Palo Alto

OPT 1 – Enable threat prevention

Palo Alto customer that have Threat Prevention subscriptions can block attacks for this vulnerability by enabling Threat ID 95187 (introduced in Applications and Threats content version 8833-8682).

After enabling Threat ID 95187, ensure that vulnerability protection has been applied to their GlobalProtect interface to prevent exploitation of this issue on their device. https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/globalprotect-articles/applying-vulnerability-protection-to-globalprotect-interfaces/ta-p/340184 for more information.

If you are unable to apply the Threat Prevention based mitigation at this time, you can still mitigate the impact of this vulnerability by temporarily disabling device telemetry until the device is upgraded to a fixed PAN-OS version. Once upgraded, device telemetry should be re-enabled on the device.

Option 2 – Disable the feature 

https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-0/pan-os-admin/device-telemetry/device-telemetry-configure/device-telemetry-disable.

Understanding CVE-2024-3400 and exploitation analysis

CVE-2024-3400 represents a critical unauthenticated remote code execution flaw impacting GlobalProtect within select versions of Palo Alto Networks’ PAN-OS. This command injection vulnerability demands no special conditions for execution, offering a low-barrier route and operating with root-level privileges, the highest access within a system.

Distribution of palo alto potentially vulnerable firewalls 

This severe vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges without requiring user interaction or any authentication, earning it a CVSS score of 10.0—indicating its critical nature. As per the timeline and IoC, there is evidence of exploitation even if the EPSS values are still low and there is no mass evidence of exploitation. Currently, there are 514K Palo Alto firewalls globally exposed with presence from United States, India and China

To get the latest update, those are the strings to search

Shodan (41,662): http.html_hash:-1303565546

Censys (41,163): services.http.response.body_hash=”sha1:28f1cf539f855fff3400f6199f8912908f51e1e1″

The current distribution might include several honeypots.

Currently, there is evidence of exploitation at scale with new appliance being discovered

shadowserver, palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection, affected versions,Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability

Check out the following for full details : https://dashboard.shadowserver.org/statistics/iot-devices/map/?day=2024-04-15&vendor=palo+alto+networks&model=globalprotect&geo=all&data_set=count&scale=log

Exploit Details and Detection Challenges of CVE-2024-3400

The exploit for CVE-2024-3400 operates through a straightforward XML RPC request that embeds malicious code within an XML tag, specifically

<cmd code="ping">OS command exploit is there</cmd>

This attack method underscores the need for robust API security, campaign management and injection remediation as defence in depth techniques. This vulnerability can circumvent traditional defenses like Web Application Firewalls (WAF) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) through sophisticated XML obfuscation techniques.

For entities deploying Palo Alto Networks’ PAN-OS, it’s essential to understand that while interactions with the /api endpoint may be visible in system logs, the exploit’s payload hidden within the XML body remains unlogged in standard access.log or other log files. This gap highlights the vital importance of integrating a specialized API security solution to monitor and safeguard these entry points effectively.

Given the intricate nature of these security challenges, network administrators must expand their monitoring to include a comprehensive analysis of all API traffic, with a particular emphasis on XML data, which might not usually be recorded. Adopting an advanced API security system is imperative to provide the enhanced level of oversight necessary to identify and neutralize such concealed exploits efficiently. This approach not only strengthens security protocols but also bolsters your organization’s defence against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.

CVE-2024-3400
Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability
GlobalProtect PAN-OS Exploit
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
Network Security Vulnerability Management
Cybersecurity Threat Identification
Firewall Patch Management
Vulnerability Remediation Solutions
Zero-Day Exploit Protection
Threat Prevention Strategies
Cyber Attack Mitigation
Advanced Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Cyber Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Unified Vulnerability Management (UVM)
PAN-OS 10.2, 11.0, 11.1 Security

Credit Volexity exploitation

GitHub’s Response to CVE-2024-3400 exploits

Aside from the direct evidence of exploitation for CVE-2024-3400, GitHub has actively started to remove repositories containing exploits and proof-of-concept (POC) code related to this vulnerability. An example of such swift action can be seen with the removal of one of the first exploits published for this issue, available at https://github.com/DrewskyDev/CVE-2024-3400, which was uploaded on April 12th. Despite GitHub’s efforts to curb the spread of this exploit, numerous other resources and platforms have already distributed this POC, indicating rapid dissemination across the cyber community.

CVE-2024-3400, Github, Exploits

Evidence of Exploitation for CVE-2024-3400

Evidence from security firms like Volexity has shown active exploitation of CVE-2024-3400. Attackers have been observed deploying a custom Python backdoor known as UPSTYLE and utilizing the vulnerability to establish a reverse shell, exfiltrate sensitive data, and move laterally within networks. The existence of zero-byte files on compromised devices serves as an initial indicator of exploitation, highlighting the attackers’ attempts to test and validate their access.

YARA Rules for Detection CVE-2024-3400

The cybersecurity community has developed YARA rules to aid in the detection of CVE-2024-3400 exploits. These rules are designed to scan systems for signs of the UPSTYLE backdoor and other malicious artifacts associated with the exploitation. For instance, a YARA rule may look for specific binary patterns or metadata within files that match the characteristics of the malware used in the attacks.

Scheduling Campaigns for CVE-2024-3400

Unified Vulnerability management (UVM) and/or Cyber Attack Surface management platforms (CTEM) like the ASPM platform enable organizations to schedule regular scanning campaigns focusing on specific vulnerabilities like CVE-2024-3400. These campaigns are designed to detect any attempts to exploit the vulnerability, ensuring that all systems are consistently monitored and protected. By leveraging these scheduled campaigns, organizations can proactively manage their security posture, adapting to new threats as they arise.

Indicator of Compromise for CVE-2024-3400

Name(s)update.py
Size5.1KB (5187 Bytes)
File Typetext/plain
MD50c1554888ce9ed0da1583dbdf7b31651
SHA1988fc0d23e6e30c2c46ccec9bbff50b7453b8ba9
SHA2563de2a4392b8715bad070b2ae12243f166ead37830f7c6d24e778985927f9caac
VirusTotal First SubmittedN/A

Yara rules and another indicator of compromise are available at CVE-2024-3400

How Phoenix Security ASPM and UVM Can Help Identify and schedule a campaign for CVE-2024-3400 Palo alto critical vulnerability

attack graph phoenix security
ASPM

Phoenix Security helps organizations identify and trace which systems are compromised with vulnerabilities, understanding the relation between code and the cloud. The complexity of this vulnerability derives from the widespread of implementation as well as 3rd party suppliers that might be affected by it. Unified Vulnerability Management and ASPM tools can scan the application portfolio to identify instances of vulnerable Linux and which version is exploitable, mapping out where it is deployed across the organization.

Phoenix campaigns in ASPM and in the Unified Vulnerability Management UVM module allow you to address CVE-2024-3400 in bulk with other.

Phoenix Security CVE-2024-3400
Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability
GlobalProtect PAN-OS Exploit
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
Network Security Vulnerability Management
Cybersecurity Threat Identification
Firewall Patch Management
Vulnerability Remediation Solutions
Zero-Day Exploit Protection
Threat Prevention Strategies
Cyber Attack Mitigation
Advanced Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Cyber Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Unified Vulnerability Management (UVM)
PAN-OS 10.2, 11.0, 11.1 Security

Import vulnerabilities or scan your system externally, leveraging the ASPM and UVM external attack surface to pinpoint all instances of the affected PAN-OS versions—10.2, 11.0, and 11.1. Its deep integration capabilities enable it to interface seamlessly with existing network architecture, providing a comprehensive audit of systems using the GlobalProtect gateway with device telemetry features enabled.

Prioritizing Exposed Systems:

With the inherent capability to assess exposure levels, Phoenix prioritizes remediation efforts based on risk and exposure. More exposed systems—such as those facing the internet or containing sensitive data—are bumped up in the remediation queue, ensuring that the most vulnerable assets are secured first.

Prioritize and Structure Remediation Campaign addressing CVE-2024-3400 in bulk.

palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection, cvss 10, Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability, Zero-Day Exploit, Cyber Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Unified Vulnerability Management (UVM), Advanced Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Phoenix Security
remediation campaign

Streamlined Remediation:

palo alto CVE-2024-3400, exploit, aspm, injection, cvss 10, Palo Alto Networks Firewall Vulnerability, Zero-Day Exploit, Cyber Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Unified Vulnerability Management (UVM), Advanced Security Posture Management (ASPM)

Tracking Remediation:

Phoenix’s real-time ASPM and UVM dashboard offers organizations a bird’s-eye view of the remediation process. It tracks the progress of patch deployments and the status of applied workarounds, ensuring that IT teams are informed at every step. Phoenix’s granular reporting enables organizations to monitor which systems are secured and which still require attention.

Get in control of your Application Security posture and Vulnerability management

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO