CISCO Critical Zero DAY Vulnerability on IOS XE CVE-2023-20198



cisco,
Critical Vulnerability
Zero Day
Exploited
IOS-XE
CVE-2023-20198

“Cisco,” “Critical,” “Zero-Day,” when those three words come together on an installed version of millions of routers, security professionals will have a bad day unless you tackle those vulnerabilities in your vulnerability management program. CISCO Talos has released on the 12 of October an official advisory for vulnerability CVE-2023-20198

When you add “Vulnerability,” and “Exploited” come together, it’s usually a recipe for sleepless nights for network administrators and security professionals. Unfortununately on top of that bad news nation state have also started weaponizing some of those vulnerabilities like the recent Atlassian zero day

Why the critical Vulnerability in cisco?

CISCo IOS is a network Operating system, the gateway for all the connection in an enterprise organization and modern cloud/datacentres. In the case of the recent critical issue affecting Cisco IOS XE software, a vulnerability in the web UI feature allows remote. CISCO has advised to disable the HTTPS Server feature on all of their Internet-facing IOS XE devices to protect against a critical zero-day vulnerability in the Web User Interface of the operating system that an attacker is actively exploiting. 

CVE-2023-20198: Maximum-Severity Flaw

“The vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to create an account on an affected system with privilege level 15 access,” Cisco said in an advisory on Oct. 16 on the new zero-day bug. “The attacker can then use that account to gain control of the affected system.” Privilege level 15 on a Cisco IOS system basically means having complete access to all commands including those for reloading the system and making configuration changes.

What are the consequences of CVE-2023-20198 on Cisco?

Tracked as CVE-2023-20198, this zero-day vulnerability impacts Cisco’s IOS XE software and has been assigned a severity rating of 10.0 on the CVSS scoring system—a perfect ten, but not the kind you want to brag about. This vulnerability affects only enterprise networking gear with the Web UI feature enabled and exposed to the internet or untrusted networks.

The flaw enables a remote attacker to create an account with privilege level 15 access without any authentication. Imagine walking into Fort Knox, and someone just hands you the keys. Tracking this vulnerability is key for your vulnerability management and prioritizing the systems that are externally facing even more priority

Recent Developments

Cisco discovered the critical flaw after spotting malicious activity on a customer device. Subsequent investigations revealed unauthorized users creating local accounts with usernames like “cisco_tac_admin” and “cisco_support”—because nothing says “suspicious” like a name that tries too hard to look legitimate.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an advisory, and threat actors have reportedly exploited the vulnerability to compromise thousands of devices. Security researcher Jacob Baines eloquently summarized the situation: “This is a bad situation, as privileged access on the IOS XE likely allows attackers to monitor network traffic, pivot into protected networks, and perform any number of man-in-the-middle attacks.”

Recommendations

For those running Cisco IOS XE, it’s strongly recommended to disable the HTTP server feature on internet-facing systems. You wouldn’t leave your front door wide open; why do the equivalent with your network?

If your IOS version is vulnerable to CVE-2023-20198 and being compromised?

  • Backup the configuration
  • Flash IOS and recreate configuration (from backup)

For more information on cisa kev and other zero day check

How to detect CVE-2023-20198?


One method to identify if the implant is present is to run the following command against the device, where the “DEVICEIP” portion is a placeholder for the IP address of the device to check:  

curl -k -X POST “https[:]//DEVICEIP/webui/logoutconfirm.html?logon_hash=1” 

Note: The above check should use the HTTP scheme if the device is only configured for an insecure web interface. 

This will request the device’s Web UI to see if the implant is present. If the request returns a hexadecimal string, like 1a80b7389ccd0a5dab, the implant is present.

Cisco has also released the following Snort coverage to address this threat. The first Snort ID is an older rule that covers CVE-2021-1435, and the last three alert if interaction with the implant occurs:  

  • 3:50118:2  
  • 3:62527:1 
  • 3:62528:1 
  • 3:62529:1  

Testing for CVE-2023-20198

You can use this python script to test the scanning results and load them up in Phoenix security as results.

https://github.com/securityphoenix/cisco-CVE-2023-20198-tester

https://github.com/Shadow0ps/CVE-2023-20198-Scanner

Use the script at your own risk; feel free to edit and modify, please note all the scanners use https probe and might be illegal in your country use at your own risk

An alternative script is available here (go based)

What is the exploitation data behind CVE-2023-20198, and how widespread are those vulnerabilities?

CVSS: 10 / 9.8

CTI interest: Low 8.25 (high)

RCE Type Remote: High, Access through HTTPS port (recommended disabling) with chance of Privilege escalation

Availability: Yes

Status: Disclosed

EPSS Score: – recent addition – 0.007470000, date: 2023-10-17

Currently, there are 1814 systems with the XE version of software and port exposed over the web with a total installation of 7M systems across the globe and 921,665 systems on IOS alone spanning from the USA to Asia. This vulnerability has a vast attack surface!

cisco,
Critical Vulnerability
Zero Day
Exploited
IOS-XE
CVE-2023-20198
vulnerability managment

Conclusion

While the world of cybersecurity is full of noise and advisories this vulnerability advisory and alert is real. Like wargame, our resources as defenders are fairly limited and we need to understand the exposure of vulnerabilities.

How Phoenix Security Can Help

attack graph phoenix security
ASPM

Phoenix Security helps organizations identify and trace which systems have vulnerabilities, understanding the relation between code and cloud. One of the significant challenges in securing applications is knowing where and how frameworks like Struts are used. ASPM tools can scan the application portfolio to identify instances of Struts, mapping out where it is deployed across the organization. This information is crucial for targeted security measures and efficient patch management. Phoenix Security’s robust Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) system is adept at not just managing, but preempting the exploitation of vulnerabilities through its automated identification system. This system prioritises critical vulnerabilities, ensuring that teams can address the most pressing threats first, optimising resource allocation and remediation efforts.

The Role of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM):

ASPM plays a vital role in managing and securing applications like those built with Apache Struts. It involves continuous assessment, monitoring, and improvement of the security posture of applications. ASPM tools can:

  1. Identify and Track Struts Components: Locate where Struts is implemented within the application infrastructure.
  2. Vulnerability Management: Detect known vulnerabilities in Struts and prioritize them for remediation.
  3. Configuration Monitoring: Ensure Struts configurations adhere to best security practices.
  4. Compliance: Check if the usage of Struts aligns with relevant cybersecurity regulations and standards.

By leveraging Phoenix Security, you not only unravel the potential threats but also take a significant stride in vulnerability management, ensuring your application security remains up to date and focuses on the key vulnerabilities.

Get in control of your Application Security posture and Vulnerability management

Other Resources

Previous Issues of Vulnerability Weekly



Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO