Contextualize Prioritize and ACT ON RISK
Login
Get Access
Demo

blog

The Rising Threat of HTTP/2 Vulnerabilities: From Rapid Reset to Continuation Flood CVE-2024-27316, CVE-2024-24549

HTTP/2 vulnerability, Continuation Flood attack, Rapid Reset DDoS, cybersecurity threats, Apache HTTP Server CVE-2024-27316, Envoy CVE-2024-27919, Node.js security patch, AMPHP CVE-2024-2653, Apache Tomcat CVE-2024-24549, Golang CVE-2023-45288, Nghttp2 CVE-2024-28182, Tempesta FW CVE-2024-2758, vulnerability mitigation strategies, protocol security enhancements
ASPM, HTTP/2 vulnerability, Continuation Flood attack, Rapid Reset DDoS, cybersecurity threats, Apache HTTP Server CVE-2024-27316, Envoy CVE-2024-27919, Node.js security patch, AMPHP CVE-2024-2653, Apache Tomcat CVE-2024-24549, Golang CVE-2023-45288, Nghttp2 CVE-2024-28182, Tempesta FW CVE-2024-2758, vulnerability mitigation strategies, protocol security enhancements"

At the beginning of the year, we had a flood of DDoS due to HTTP/2 failure, a series of vulnerabilities like CVE-2024-27316, CVE-2024-24549, and others can cause DDoS, in systems like software components like AMPHP, Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat, Apache Traffic Server, Envoy, Golang, Node.js, Nghttp2, and Tempesta FW calling for ASPM and urgent attention for upgrading. This article delves into two significant vulnerabilities—Rapid Reset and the HTTP/2 Continuation Flood—highlighting their impact and the urgent call for mitigation efforts, particularly concerning software components like AMPHP, Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat, Apache Traffic Server, Envoy, Golang, Node.js, Nghttp2, and Tempesta FW.

Understanding the HTTP/2 Protocol

HTTP/2 was designed to enhance web performance and efficiency. However, like any technological advancement, it introduced new vulnerabilities that malicious actors could exploit. The discovery of the ASPM vulnerability, along with others, has brought to light the ongoing vulnerability campaign aimed at exploiting these weaknesses, particularly through DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks.

The main difference between HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 is that the later is a binary protocol and client and server exchange frames instead of text lines. There are many frame types, including some control frames that does not transmit data but rather allow configuration of an HTTP/2 session (like SETTINGS or WINDOW_UPDATE). To make this vulnerability easy to understand I need to present two frames: HEADERS frame and CONTINUATION frame. For those who would like to catch up, the best way to learn it is by reading RFC9204.

The Emergence of Rapid Reset and HTTP/2 Continuation Flood

CONTINUATION frames are very similar to HEADER frames but they have just one flag: END_HEADERS which has the same function: when set the counterparty knows that more headers are coming in the following CONTINUATION frames.

Rapid Reset emerged as a formidable exploit, leveraging the HTTP/2 protocol’s stream cancellation feature to launch significant DDoS attacks. This vulnerability demonstrated the potential for even small botnets to cause substantial disruptions, making it a wake-up call for the cybersecurity community.

However, the HTTP/2 Continuation Flood has since been identified as an even more severe threat. Discovered by security researchers, this vulnerability exploits the protocol’s handling of CONTINUATION frames, leading to server instability, crashes, or memory exhaustion. Its stealthy nature—leaving no trace in HTTP access logs—compounds the challenge of detection and mitigation.

The attack uses an infinite chain of continuation

Reference https://nowotarski.info/http2-continuation-flood-technical-details

Exploitability

Despite not having evidence of exploit at scale, due to the DDoS nature and simplicity of attack is recommended high attention

Also, due to the nature of the embedded device and HTTP service, several 3rd party software will be affected:e.g. arista

more of those will come as the vulnerability evolves

Affected Software and the Call for Action

The HTTP/2 Continuation Flood affects a wide range of software, highlighting the vulnerability’s extensive reach. Notably, the following components have been identified as vulnerable, each assigned specific CVE identifiers indicating the need for immediate attention:

Mitigation and Forward Steps

The disclosure of these vulnerabilities has spurred a coordinated effort among developers, businesses, and cybersecurity professionals to patch affected systems and fortify their defenses against potential attacks. Upgrading to the latest versions of impacted software is crucial to mitigating the threats posed by the HTTP/2 Continuation Flood and other related vulnerabilities.

Moreover, organizations are advised to conduct regular vulnerability assessments and embrace a proactive stance towards cybersecurity. Understanding the intricacies of the HTTP/2 protocol and the nature of these vulnerabilities is essential in developing robust defense mechanisms against evolving cyber threats.

Conclusion

The discovery of vulnerabilities like Rapid Reset and the HTTP/2 Continuation Flood within the HTTP/2 protocol serves as a stark reminder of the dynamic landscape of cybersecurity threats. As technology continues to advance, so too do the opportunities for exploitation. It’s imperative that the cybersecurity community remains vigilant, collaborative, and proactive in its efforts to protect digital infrastructure from such vulnerabilities. By staying informed and prepared, we can navigate the complexities of the digital age with confidence and resilience.

How Phoenix Security Can Help Identify and schedule campaign for HTTP/2 continuation flood

attack graph phoenix security ASPM

Phoenix Security helps organizations identify and trace which systems have vulnerabilities, understanding the relation between code and the cloud. One of the significant challenges in securing applications is knowing where and where HTTP/2 library is used. ASPM tools can scan the application portfolio to identify instances of vulnerable Linux and which version is exploitable, mapping out where it is deployed across the organization. This information is crucial for targeted security measures and efficient patch management. Phoenix Security’s robust Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) system is adept at not just managing, but preempting the exploitation of vulnerabilities through its automated identification system. This system prioritises critical vulnerabilities, ensuring that teams can first address the most pressing threats and then optimise resource allocation and remediation efforts.

CVE-2024-27316 and campaign Phoenix allow to address CVE-2024-27316 in bulk with others, following an example of the most recent liblzma campaign CVE-2024-3094

CVE-2024-3094, jira , ASPM

The Role of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM):

phoenix security CVE-2024-3094, Linux Security, xz-utils, liblzma,

ASPM plays a vital role in managing and securing applications like those built with HTTP/2. It involves continuous assessment, monitoring, and improvement of the security posture of applications. ASPM tools can:

  1. Identify and Track Vulnerable Versions/ Components: Locate where HTTP/2 is implemented within the software package.
  2. Vulnerability Management: Detect known vulnerabilities in HTTP/2 and prioritize them for remediation.
  3. Configuration Monitoring: Ensure HTTP/2 configurations adhere to best security practices.
  4. Compliance: Check if the usage of HTTP/2 aligns with relevant cybersecurity regulations and standards.
  5. Raise Exceptions where specific versions are not affected
phoenix security CVE-2024-3094, Linux Security, xz-utils, liblzma,

By leveraging Phoenix Security, you not only unravel the potential threats but also take a significant stride in vulnerability management, ensuring your application security remains up to date and focuses on the key vulnerabilities.

Get in control of your Application Security posture and Vulnerability management

Get a Demo today

Picture of Francesco Cipollone

Francesco Cipollone

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.
7th April 2024
Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

Join Slack community
Linkedin-in Youtube Facebook-f Twitter Instagram

From our Blog

Orca Security Integration ASPM Phoenix Security
  • 8th July 2025

Orca Security Integration with Phoenix Security ASPM Vulnerability Management From Code to Cloud

Phoenix Security has integrated Orca Security to enhance vulnerability management across runtime environments and cloud infrastructure. This agentless expansion brings cloud misconfiguration remediation, real-time risk intelligence, and full code-to-cloud security visibility into the ASPM platform, empowering DevSecOps teams to prioritize and resolve high-impact application security issues across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Alfonso Eusebio
Semgrep Integration ASPM Phoenix Security
  • 3rd July 2025

Semgrep Integration – SAST and SCA enhanced by Phoenix Security ASPM Vulnerability Management Enhanced

Phoenix Security has integrated Semgrep to enhance code-to-cloud security coverage, bringing high-performance static analysis and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into its Application Security Posture Management platform. This integration empowers DevSecOps teams with faster triage, contextual vulnerability management, and precise prioritization across cloud-native environments including AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Alfonso Eusebio
  • 19th June 2025

Phoenix Security – June Major Release – 3.28

The team at Phoenix Security pleased to bring you another set of new application security (ASPM) features and improvements for vulnerability management across application and cloud security engines. This release builds on top of previous releases with key additions and progress across multiple areas of the platform. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Enhancements • New Weighted Asset Risk Formula – Refined risk aggregation for tailored vulnerability management. • Auto-Approval of Risk Exceptions – Accelerate mitigation by automating security approvals. • Enhanced Risk Explorer & Business Unit Insights – Monitor and analyze risk exposure by business units for better prioritization. Vulnerability & Asset Management • Link Findings to Existing Tickets – Seamless GitHub, ServiceNow, and Azure DevOps integration. • Multi-Finding Ticketing for ADO – Group multiple vulnerabilities in a single ticket for better workflow management. • Filter by Business Unit, CWE, Ownership, and Deployment Environment – Target vulnerabilities with precision using advanced filtering. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Security Enhancements • Cyber Threat Intelligence Premium – Access 128,000+ exploits for better exploitability and fixability metrics. • SBOM, Container SBOM & Open Source Artifact Analysis – Conduct deep security analysis with reachability insights. • Enhanced Lacework Container Management – Fetch and analyze running container details for better security reporting. • REST API Enhancements – Use asset tags for automated deployments and streamline security processes. Other Key Updates • CVE & CWE Columns Added – Compare vulnerabilities more effectively. • Custom Status Management for Findings – Personalize security workflows with custom status configurations. • Impact & Risk Explorer Side Panel – Gain heatmap-based insights into vulnerability distribution and team risk impact. 🚀 Stay ahead of vulnerabilities, optimize risk assessment, and enhance security efficiency with Phoenix Security’s latest features! 🚀
Alfonso Eusebio
ASPM. IRoN BcIRON CLAD, Brass Knuckle Se
  • 1st June 2025

Brass Knuckle Security: Why ASPM Alone Isn’t Enough: Introducing IronClad™, a New Operating Model for Secure Enterprise Software Development

We don’t need more tools. We need a new way of thinking. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) promises the world, but most teams crumble under tool sprawl, silos, and endless ticket queues. That’s why I built IronClad™ — a brutally simple, brutally effective operating model that fuses ASPM with decentralized ownership and ruthless clarity. This isn’t theory. It’s how security teams can actually win: small empowered squads, zero ambiguity, and mission-first remediation. If you’re tired of drowning in dashboards and ready to rethink how your teams build, secure, and scale, this is the blueprint. 👉 Read how ASPM + IronClad™ flips the script on vulnerability management.
Phil Moroni
ASPM, rthreat centric, threat actor, agentic ai, aspm, application security, vulnerability managment.
  • 11th May 2025

The New role of Threat-Centric Approach in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) an Agentic ASPM in real life

As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, the need for a more proactive and comprehensive approach to vulnerability management is undeniable. A threat-centric methodology, when combined with advanced tools like Agentic AI and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), offers organizations the ability to predict and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited by threat actors. This article delves into how leveraging threat intelligence, exposure and reachability analysis, and contextual risk assessments can help organizations stay ahead of cyber threats, specifically focusing on high-risk vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE) and memory corruption. Through case studies like Citrix ADC and MOVEit Transfer, the article highlights the growing trend of zero-day exploits and emphasizes the importance of a proactive, data-driven security strategy. In a world where vulnerabilities are constantly targeted, adopting a threat-centric approach is not just a best practice—it’s essential to ensuring long-term security. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
  • 27th April 2025

ASPM at Two Speeds: Remediation Strategies for Every Security Journey & CVE/NVD Collapse

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
x Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO →