Understanding the 2024 CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses and application security and how ASPM can help

CWE Top 25, CISA, MITRE, ASPM, Phoenix Security, Application Security, Vulnerability Management

The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE), a community-developed list of software and hardware weakness types, has released its annual “Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses” for 2024 for application security and vulnerability management teams; we discover in this blog the patterns and the main categories of the new CWE top 25. 

Note this page makes use of embedded diagrams. If you can’t see the interactive diagrams, please disable frames blocking.

We will cover in detail a comparison of the CWE top 25 across the years and across datasets. One of the new objectives is to simplify the classification in macro categories (e.g. Memory corruption and Auth bypass). We will mix AI mapping technique, vector description, and already existing analysis (CWE 1400 and CWE 1000 views)

CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses for 2024 compared to 2023 and CISA KEV

Why CWE is important in Application Security and Vulnerability management and how ASPM can help

In application security, defenders face the ongoing challenge of identifying more dangerous patterns. The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) provides a structured way to catalog these weaknesses, culminating each year in the CWE Top 25—a snapshot of the most frequently occurring and highly severe vulnerabilities. Yet real-world exploit data (e.g., CISA KEV, VulnCheck, Ransomware usage) can diverge from the overall CWE list, leaving security and vulnerability management teams struggling to prioritize effectively.

Below, we explore the 2024 Top 25, where it aligns with external datasets, and how modern techniques—like AI mapping and ASPM (Application Security Posture Management)—bridge the gap to classify more vulnerabilities accurately.

Get an Assessment of the common root cause and patterns in your vulnerabilities

Why CWE and the Top 25 Matter

1. What are CWEs?

• CWEs are categories of software (and sometimes hardware) weaknesses. They go beyond symptoms (e.g., “RCE” or “DoS”) and drill into the root cause—like OS Command Injection (78) or Improper Privilege Management (269).

2. What is the CWE Top 25?

• Each year, the MITRE Team aggregates thousands of CVE records, scoring them by frequency (how many times a weakness appears) and severity (average CVSS score). The highest “danger scores” earn a spot in the Top 25.

3. Why is it sometimes misleading?

• Different attackers have different goals. For instance, Ransomware operators love Path Traversal (22) or privilege escalation flaws (269) to spread faster and encrypt critical data, while typical bug bounty data is riddled with XSS (79). So your prioritisation might differ depending on your environment or threat model.

2. AI-Driven Mapping and Closing the “Unclassified” Gap

Historically, many CVEs were left at broad, high-level CWEs (like CWE-200: Information Exposure) or simply “NVD-CWE-Other.” By tapping AI-driven keyword extraction and classification, the CWE project re-examined CVE descriptions for more precise matches (Base or Variant CWEs). This year, that approach reduced the number of “unclassified” vulnerabilities by an estimated 48%—a substantial improvement that helps focus application security teams on the actual root cause.

3. Biggest Movers in CWE Top 25 for 2024

Upward Trends:

400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) soared 13 places; resource exhaustion attacks have become more prominent, including DoS scenarios.

200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information) also jumped 13 ranks, highlighting persistent data-leak issues.

269 (Improper Privilege Management) leapt by 7, consistent with deeper access-control misconfigurations discovered this year.

Downward Trends:

20 (Improper Input Validation) slipped 6, partly because chain analysis was underused, leading those flaws to be mapped more specifically (e.g., directly to SQL Injection or XSS).

190 (Integer Overflow) also dropped 9, overshadowed by more impactful memory-corruption entries like Out-of-Bounds Write (787).

4. Top Vulnerability Categories—and Where They Diverge

1. Access Control

• The largest chunk of the 2024 list covers access control issues: Improper Authentication (CWE-287), Missing Authorization (CWE-862), and Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863). These weaknesses top certain bug bounty lists but may rank differently in ransomware contexts.

2. Memory Safety

• Nation-state attackers and advanced groups frequently exploit memory-corruption CWEs (CWE-119, CWE-787, CWE-125, etc.). CISA KEV references highlight these as actively exploited. Yet bug bounty data rarely sees them at the top—researchers typically focus on web-facing vulnerabilities.

3. Injection

• Includes SQL Injection (CWE-89), OS Command Injection (CWE-78), and Code Injection (CWE-94). In bug bounties, injection flaws remain top earners (especially XSS, CWE-79). Meanwhile, ransomware operators lean more towards direct file or auth bypass vectors, occasionally leveraging OS Command Injection for quick RCE.

4. Resource & Lifecycle Management

• Refers to issues like Unrestricted File Upload (CWE-434) or Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400). Ransomware groups find some success here, too—especially when file uploads allow them to drop malicious binaries.

Divergence Example:

CWE-22 (Path Traversal) ranks #5 overall in the Top 25, but it’s #1 among ransomware actors because it helps them locate and encrypt valuable files. Conversely, CWE-79 (XSS) is #1 in the overall list but doesn’t crack the top 10 for ransomware usage.

5. Leveraging ASPM for Unified Vulnerability Management

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) ties all these insights together in a single pane of glass. It looks at your entire environment—source code, CI/CD pipelines, production apps—and correlates data from:

CISA KEV for in-the-wild exploited vulnerabilities.

VulnCheck for publicly available proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits.

Bug Bounty reports and internal scanners.

By tracking categories (e.g., Access Control, Memory Safety) and CWEs simultaneously, ASPM clarifies your highest-risk flaws. For instance, if an Insecure Deserialization (CWE-502) ranks mid-table in the Top 25 but also appears in CISA KEV or is known to be popular with ransomware operators, ASPM can prioritise those issues higher.

Key ASPM Benefits for CWE top 25 and OWASP top 25:

1. Automated Classification: AI-powered correlation ensures fewer “NVD-CWE-Other” placeholders.

2. Threat Context: Identifies whether a given CWE is highly exploited (e.g., from real KEV data).

3. Actionable Remediation: Integrates with your DevOps or ticketing systems to fix vulnerabilities faster.

Conclusion: Combining CWE Top 25 with Real-World Intelligence

Comparative Data: Cross-referencing the 2024 CWE Top 25 against CISA KEV, VulnCheck, and ransomware usage reveals meaningful divergences—particularly around memory safety vs. web injection or path traversal vs. XSS.

AI-Assisted Mapping: Thanks to improved classification methods, the list is more precise than ever—reducing “noise” and clarifying truly relevant root causes.

ASPM Integration: By pairing the CWE framework with unified vulnerability management tools, you gain a complete picture of exploit potential, business impact, and actual attacker behavior.

Ultimately, the CWE Top 25 is no silver bullet—it’s a foundation. When layered with intelligence feeds and next-gen ASPM, it helps security teams shrink the “unclassified” gap and confidently tackle the vulnerabilities that matter most to their specific threat landscape—be it ransomware, nation-state exploits, or everyday bug bounty findings.

Pro Tip: Focus on the categories—Access Control still dominates the list, while Memory Safety leads advanced exploitation. Then overlay your environment’s data (e.g., is OS code a prime target? Are you mostly web-based?) to shape your 2024 security roadmap.

How can Phoenix Security Help

Phoenix traces CVE and CWE dynamically, offering you an overview of the top CWE in your organization.

Phoenix also trace the top CVE and CWE that teams introduce

Phoenix security cutting-edge contextual risk-based algorithms enable organizations to prioritize application security vulnerabilities based on context and probability of exploitation and present a unified impact analysis.

The cutting-edge vulnerability selection engine enables organizations to set risk-based targets that translate into specific actions for engineers. 

Get in control of your Application Security posture and Vulnerability management

Moreover, Phoenix Security’s correlation capabilities can help organizations link the activities in the code with the context in the shift-right part, ensuring that issues are identified and addressed proactively. Using Phoenix Security’s scorecard, organizations can create a common language between the security, development, and business teams, ensuring everyone is aligned and focused on achieving the same goals.

shift smart, risk based, vulnerability management, phoenix security

Finally, Phoenix Security’s ability to create risk-based profiles can help organizations translate their security goals into dynamic and smart targets for engineers. By using risk-based profiles, engineers can prioritize their work and focus on the most critical issues, ensuring they effectively use their time and resources.

Overall, by leveraging Phoenix Security’s powerful capabilities, organizations can implement a smart, risk-based approach to software development that ensures the success of their initiatives while minimizing risk and improving overall efficiency. With Phoenix Security as their partner, organizations can feel confident they are taking a proactive approach to software development aligned with their business objectives and goals.

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

Are never-ending critical alerts leaving you scrambling? Explore how reachability analysis identifies vulnerabilities that truly matter, saving your teams from needless patch frenzies. This session, hosted by the OWASP NYC Chapter, uncovers the latest insights in ASPM, remediation techniques, and application security best practices. Attendees learn how to streamline vulnerability management through practical examples, advanced risk scoring, and live demonstrations of container-based architectures. Expect lively discussions, real-world success stories, and expert tips on targeting only the exploitable weaknesses—rather than chasing every single alert in your backlog.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity landscape is evolving rapidly, demanding a threat-centric, risk-based approach to vulnerability management. With the U.S. favoring voluntary guidelines and Europe enforcing stricter regulations, organizations must navigate compliance while focusing on real exploitability over CVE volume. This blog delves into ASPM, cloud security, and regulatory intelligence, exploring how businesses can move beyond the traditional patch-and-pray model to address root cause vulnerabilities before they become critical risks.
Francesco Cipollone
Enhance your vulnerability management with Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and reachability analysis. Discover how ASPM helps prioritize exploitable vulnerabilities, reduce security noise, and improve risk management. Learn about advanced techniques like code and container reachability, contextual deduplication, and Phoenix Security’s cutting-edge solutions for smarter, more effective application security.
Francesco Cipollone
The 2024 CWE Top 25 is out, and it’s no casual stroll through the vulnerability garden—especially when ransomware operators are busy planting path traversal exploits, while bug bounty hunters dig up endless injection flaws. In this blog, we examine the biggest risers, the most surprising dips, and the divergence between real-world exploit data and official CWE rankings. We’ll also reveal how AI-driven ASPM (Application Security Posture Management) and Phoenix Security’s contextual risk-based approach unite to help you focus on your most pressing threats. After all, not all flaws are created equal—some are simply more mischievous than others.
Francesco Cipollone
The 2024 CWE Top 25 list highlights the most dangerous software weaknesses. This article explores the methodology behind the list and how AI is improving threat detection. Discover how Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and unified vulnerability management can help organizations address these critical threats.
Francesco Cipollone
Phoenix Security kicks off 2025 with recognition from Gartner Digital Markets through GetApp, solidifying its position as a leader in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). Recognised for best customer success and support in ASPM, Phoenix Security empowers organisations with comprehensive, contextual vulnerability management and actionable cybersecurity solutions. With a user-friendly interface, robust real-time monitoring, and seamless risk prioritisation, the platform reduces alert fatigue while delivering precise remediation. As a cloud security leader, Phoenix Security continues to innovate, partnering with enterprises like LastPass and ClearBank to tackle the modern cybersecurity landscape head-on.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO