Understanding the NVD backlog, CISA, and the Vulnrichment Program: Addressing the NVD Backlog

NVD Burndown SQ

The NVD vulnerability backlog has reached 12603 vulnerabilities pending analysis. With the absence of a product, we and other core elements, the application security, ASTM, and other vendors are struggling to catch up. Phoenix Security has already started pre-processing a number of vulnerabilities and ingesting enrichment CISA and other raw sources like CVE.org. Managing software vulnerabilities is a critical aspect of cybersecurity. Organisations rely on comprehensive databases and enrichment programs to stay ahead of potential threats. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are two key players in this field. Recently, CISA launched the Vulnrichment program to address the growing backlog of vulnerabilities, which could reshape how we manage and mitigate cyber threats.

This article provides an in-depth look at what the NVD is, the role of CISA, the vulnerability backlog and how the Vulnrichment program aims to tackle the vulnerability backlog burndown current challenges in vulnerability management.

NVD, NVD Backlog, NVD Vulnerabilty backlog, NVD VUlnerability burndown, Burdown initaitive, CISA, CISA KEV, Phoenix Security

What is the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and vulnerability backlog?

The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is the U.S. government’s repository of standards-based vulnerability management data. Managed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the NVD includes databases of security checklists, security-related software flaws, misconfigurations, product names, and impact metrics. It provides valuable information that organizations use to ensure their systems and networks are secure.

Key Features of the NVD:

  • Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE): A list of publicly disclosed information security vulnerabilities and exposures.
  • Common Platform Enumeration (CPE): A standardized method of describing and identifying classes of applications, operating systems, and hardware devices.
  • Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS): A free and open industry standard for assessing the severity of computer system security vulnerabilities.
  • Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE): A list of software weaknesses.

The NVD plays a crucial role in being the central point of vulnerability information. However, recent challenges have led to a significant backlog in vulnerability analysis and enrichment.

What is CISA?

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is a federal agency under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It is responsible for enhancing the security, resilience, and reliability of the nation’s cybersecurity and communications infrastructure.

CISA’s Key Responsibilities:

  • Cybersecurity: Protecting federal networks and collaborating with private sector partners to defend critical infrastructure.
  • Infrastructure Security: Ensuring the security of the physical infrastructure and assets that are essential to the nation’s security, economy, and public health.
  • Emergency Communications: Improving emergency communications capabilities across the nation.

CISA is often the first to issue public warnings about vulnerabilities that are being actively exploited in the wild. This proactive approach helps organizations take immediate action to protect their systems.

Reasons for the NVD Vulnerability Backlog

NVD Backlog burndown, NVD Vulnerabilty backlog, NVD Vulnerability burndown, Burdown initaitive, CISA Vulnrichment, Phoenix Security Research

Several factors have contributed to the current backlog in the NVD:

Resource Constraints

One of the primary reasons for the backlog is the limited resources and budget constraints faced by NIST. With insufficient funding and staffing, the agency struggled to keep up with the volume of new vulnerabilities being reported. This has led to delays in analyzing and enriching CVE records, resulting in a significant accumulation of unprocessed data.

Speculation on New CPE Initiative

The introduction of a new CPE initiative has also been speculated to contribute to the backlog. Implementing a new system for describing and identifying software and hardware products requires time and effort. While ultimately beneficial for standardization and accuracy, this change has temporarily slowed down the enrichment process.

Change in CVE Format

Another factor is the adoption of the new CVE format (version 5.1). While the updated format aims to provide more detailed and structured information, the transition has required adjustments in processes and tools used for vulnerability analysis. This transition period has contributed to delays in processing and enriching CVE records.

The Current State of the Vulnerability Backlog

NVD Backlog burndown, NVD Vulnerabilty backlog, NVD Vulnerability burndown, Burdown initaitive, CISA, Phoenix Security Research

As of May 23, 2024, the NVD faces a significant backlog in vulnerability analysis. According to the Automation Working Group’s report on May 22, CISA is currently analyzing and enriching approximately 200 vulnerabilities per day. Here are some critical statistics:

  • Daily Vulnerability Discovery: Between 84-98 new vulnerabilities are discovered daily.
  • Vulnerabilities Since February 15: Over 10,118 new vulnerabilities have been discovered since February 15, with the current total standing at 12,603.
  • Analysis Capacity: CISA’s new team can analyze and enrich 4,364 vulnerabilities per month.
  • New Vulnerabilities: A conservative estimate of 2,981 new vulnerabilities are discovered each month.

For additional statistics on vulnerability and exploitability, refer to:

Given these numbers, it will take the new team approximately 10-11 months to clear the current backlog, assuming there are no disruptions. This sets the first target date for a clear backlog around March 2025.

For a wider analysis of the other implications of NVD backlog, refer to nvd-exploited vulnerabilities article and vulncheck report 

Get in touch for a maturity assessment

The Vulnrichment Program: Addressing the NVD Vulnerability Backlog

In response to NIST scaling down its involvement with the NVD due to resource constraints, CISA launched the Vulnrichment program. The primary goal of this initiative is to enrich CVE records with additional data, making it easier for organizations to manage vulnerabilities effectively.

  • Data Enrichment: Adding CPE, CVSS, CWE, and Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) information to CVE records to address the NVD Vulnerability Backlog

As part of the efforts to address the significant backlog in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and manage new vulnerabilities, CISA has launched the Burndown Initiative. This initiative aims to reduce the backlog while concurrently handling new vulnerabilities systematically. This section examines the feasibility of this initiative, the projected timeline for clearing the backlog, and the challenges that may arise.

NVD Backlog Burndown Initiative Overview

The NVD Vulnerability Burndown Initiative is a structured plan to analyze and enrich both the existing the NVD Vulnerability Backlog and the newly discovered ones. The goal is to ensure that all vulnerabilities are processed in a timely manner, thus enhancing the overall cybersecurity posture.

  • Backlog: The number of vulnerabilities carried over from the previous month.
  • New: The number of new vulnerabilities discovered each month.
  • Analyzed: The number of vulnerabilities that the CISA team can analyze and enrich each month.
  • Remaining: The backlog remains at the end of each month.
NVD Backlog burndown, NVD Vulnerabilty backlog, NVD Vulnerability burndown, Burdown initaitive, Phoenix Security Research

Feasibility and Timeline

Analysis Capacity

The CISA team’s analysis and enrichment capacity is projected at 4,364 vulnerabilities per month. Considering the conservative estimate of 2,981 new vulnerabilities discovered each month, the team will need to meet or exceed this capacity to stay on track consistently.

Projected Timeline

Based on the current backlog of 12,603 vulnerabilities as of May 23, 2024, and the ongoing addition of new vulnerabilities:

  • Backlog Reduction: The initiative aims to reduce the backlog to zero by March 2025.
  • Sustainability: The team must analyze and enrich an average of 4,364 vulnerabilities per month while managing the influx of new vulnerabilities.

Challenges and Considerations

Several challenges may impact the success of the Burndown Initiative:

  1. Resource Allocation: Sustained high performance requires consistent resource allocation, including staffing and funding. Any disruption could extend the timeline.
  2. Process Optimization: Continuous improvement in the analysis and enrichment processes is critical. Automation and improved tools could enhance efficiency.
  3. New Vulnerability Trends: The actual number of new vulnerabilities could fluctuate, impacting the planned capacity. Unexpected spikes in new vulnerabilities would require an adaptable strategy.
  4. Coordination with CNAs: Effective collaboration with CVE Numbering Authorities (CNAs) to ensure timely and comprehensive data submission is essential.

Implications of the the NVD Vulnerability Backlog Vulnerability Management

The NVD Vulnerability Backlog in vulnerability analysis poses significant risks. When vulnerabilities are not analyzed and enriched with critical metadata, scanning organizations face challenges in prioritizing and mitigating threats. This can lead to increased exposure to cyber attacks, especially from nation-state actors and ransomware gangs who exploit these vulnerabilities.

The Importance of Timely Vulnerability Management:

  • Prioritization: Enriched CVE data helps organizations prioritize remediation efforts based on the severity and potential impact of vulnerabilities.
  • Trend Analysis: Understanding vulnerability trends can drive vendors to address broader classes of vulnerabilities.
  • Proactive Defense: Early warnings and detailed information about actively exploited vulnerabilities allow organizations to take proactive measures to secure their systems.

Challenges and Solutions

While the Vulnrichment program is a step in the right direction, some challenges need to be addressed to ensure its success:

  1. Resource Allocation: Ensuring that CISA and other involved agencies have adequate resources and personnel to manage the enrichment process.
  2. Collaboration: Enhanced collaboration between CNAs, CISA, and other stakeholders to ensure comprehensive and timely submission of vulnerability data.
  3. Technological Integration: Developing systems and tools that can seamlessly integrate enriched CVE data into existing vulnerability management processes.

Future Prospects

Despite the challenges, there are reasons for optimism. New initiatives such as the release of the new CVE format (version 5.1), efforts by CNAs to submit complete information, and the Vulnrichment program are promising steps towards improving vulnerability management.

Conclusion

The NVD, CISA, and the Vulnrichment program are critical components of the United States’ cybersecurity infrastructure. The recent backlog in vulnerability analysis highlights the urgent need for enhanced data enrichment processes and collaboration among all stakeholders. By addressing these challenges, the Vulnrichment program aims to provide organizations with the timely and accurate information they need to secure their systems against evolving cyber threats.

With no mandate but a hopeful target of March 2025 for resolving the current backlog, the cybersecurity community must remain vigilant and proactive in implementing effective vulnerability management strategies. This will not only improve organisational security but also contribute to the overall resilience of the nation’s critical infrastructure.

How can Phoenix Security help in addressing the NVD Vulnerability Backlog

In response to the challenges faced by the NVD, Phoenix Security offers robust Vulnerability management, ASPM and Vulnerability threat Intelligence solution that automates the enrichment process by synchronizing with NVD, CVE.org, augmenting and extracting meaning for technical analysis and syncing with the Vulnrichment initiative. Phoenix Security connects to over 32 vulnerability intelligence sources and ensures comprehensive and timely enrichment of CVE data. Additionally, their innovative 4D contextual risk-based formula provides enhanced training and prioritization, enabling organizations to effectively manage and mitigate vulnerabilities. This advanced approach not only streamlines the enrichment process but also empowers security teams with the tools and insights needed to stay ahead of evolving threats.

Get in touch for a maturity assessment

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The team at Phoenix Security pleased to bring you another set of new application security (ASPM) features and improvements for vulnerability management across application and cloud security engines. This release builds on top of previous releases with key additions and progress across multiple areas of the platform. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Enhancements • New Weighted Asset Risk Formula – Refined risk aggregation for tailored vulnerability management. • Auto-Approval of Risk Exceptions – Accelerate mitigation by automating security approvals. • Enhanced Risk Explorer & Business Unit Insights – Monitor and analyze risk exposure by business units for better prioritization. Vulnerability & Asset Management • Link Findings to Existing Tickets – Seamless GitHub, ServiceNow, and Azure DevOps integration. • Multi-Finding Ticketing for ADO – Group multiple vulnerabilities in a single ticket for better workflow management. • Filter by Business Unit, CWE, Ownership, and Deployment Environment – Target vulnerabilities with precision using advanced filtering. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Security Enhancements • Cyber Threat Intelligence Premium – Access 128,000+ exploits for better exploitability and fixability metrics. • SBOM, Container SBOM & Open Source Artifact Analysis – Conduct deep security analysis with reachability insights. • Enhanced Lacework Container Management – Fetch and analyze running container details for better security reporting. • REST API Enhancements – Use asset tags for automated deployments and streamline security processes. Other Key Updates • CVE & CWE Columns Added – Compare vulnerabilities more effectively. • Custom Status Management for Findings – Personalize security workflows with custom status configurations. • Impact & Risk Explorer Side Panel – Gain heatmap-based insights into vulnerability distribution and team risk impact. 🚀 Stay ahead of vulnerabilities, optimize risk assessment, and enhance security efficiency with Phoenix Security’s latest features! 🚀
Alfonso Eusebio
Discover CVE-2025-30066 tj-actions/changed-files GitHub Action has been compromised, exposing secrets in CI/CD pipelines and posing a major software supply chain security risk. Attackers injected malicious code into all versions (V1–V45), repointing existing tags to a compromised commit that exfiltrated credentials via GitHub Actions logs. Immediate remediation is required—organizations must scan their repositories, rotate secrets, and replace the action to mitigate risk. Learn how Phoenix Security’s ASPM can automate threat detection and enhance GitHub Actions security.
Francesco Cipollone
Tired of scrambling every time a new zero-day hits the headlines? Discover a threat-centric approach to vulnerability management that tackles root causes head-on. Dive into real-world examples—like the notorious Log4j (CVE-2021-44228)—and learn how ASPM application security, cybersecurity best practices, and frameworks (CVE → CWE → CAPEC → MITRE ATT&CK) can streamline remediation. Whether it’s ransomware or unauthorized access attempts on QNAP devices, see how focusing on broad threat categories and root cause analysis can supercharge your defense strategy and minimize patch fatigue.
Francesco Cipollone
ClearBank broke a 250-year banking tradition by becoming the UK’s first new clearing bank in centuries—a bold move that extends to their approach to cybersecurity. In partnership with Phoenix Security, ClearBank has pioneered advanced Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) techniques that go beyond merely identifying vulnerabilities. By focusing on root causes, defense in depth, and real-world context—like which services are mission-critical or shielded by a WAF—their teams prioritize what truly matters. Neil Reed, Principal AppSec Engineer, underscores the importance of targeted remediation, using Phoenix’s exception engine to intelligently downgrade or reclassify findings that pose minimal risk. This risk-based strategy is a game-changer in scaling security without overburdening engineering teams. By running structured remediation campaigns and cutting container noise by up to 91%, ClearBank’s DevSecOps workflow has evolved to be both agile and robust. Their forward-thinking stance shows how the right blend of technology, context, and collaboration can fortify an organization, keeping pace with shifting regulations and emerging threats.
Neil Reed
EPSS V4 arrives March 17 with new insights on real-world exploit likelihood. Preliminary data shows moderate score shifts, though outliers exist, including a puzzling jump for CVE-2007-4559. Binned distributions reveal minimal changes near the lower end, often tied to unverified exploits, while bug bounty activity and threat feeds help validate higher-risk flaws. Ransomware campaigns frequently target vulnerabilities with high EPSS scores, reminding security teams that a single metric rarely provides the full picture. ASPM, application security reviews, and ongoing remediation efforts round out a more comprehensive approach. This holistic method considers bug bounty reports, active scanning, and real-time intel, ensuring that unknown zero-day threats are not overlooked.
Francesco Cipollone
Executives often pose one question: “Who owns this risk, and how extensive is it?” Phoenix Security addresses that challenge with Blast Radius Analysis and Business Unit Impact Analysis. These features bring clarity to ASPM initiatives, highlight shared vulnerabilities like Log4j, and offer a path to deeper root cause discoveries. Experience streamlined accountability, minimized patch cycles, and a stronger cybersecurity posture—all in one platform.- Mapping of vulnerabilities to Installed Software – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO