Using SLAs for Better Vulnerability Management & Remediation: Improving Developer’s Workflow

AppSec Phoenix SLA Targets
AppSec Phoenix SLA Targets
AppSec Phoenix SLA Targets

SLAs (Service Level Agreements) are pretty common among vendors and companies in the IT industries. This agreement defines all the expectations of a company from their service provider or vendor based on various metrics to measure the estimated performance.

The SLAs are also used by various departments within a company to smoothly run all operations based on certain expectations. The same goes for the Cybersecurity industry where companies sign SLAs to fix certain vulnerabilities in a 30, 60 or 90 days period.

This time period is pretty vague and arbitrary, therefore security experts rarely meet the expectations because of various reasons. Let’s dive deep and see how important is SLA for resolving vulnerabilities to help other counterparts such as developers work better.

Importance of SLAs in Vulnerability Management

Service-level agreements are adopted by many companies who deal with vendors in their industry. In the cybersecurity sphere, SLAs are also utilized by company executives to fix certain vulnerabilities in a fixed number of days or months. Many executives expect unachievable results in their SLAs, especially when it comes to fixing vulnerabilities.

For Example, many companies aim for fixing vulnerabilities with CVSS Score of 7 or above in a 30 days time frame. The security teams ask IT experts or other counterparts to fix vulnerabilities with a 7+ CVSS score in less than 30 days. These vulnerabilities are often counted as half of all other CVSS scores. It is extremely hard for security experts to achieve this goal within given time period.

Therefore, companies need to measure the extent of work before they impose an SLA to any counterparts within or outside their organization. They should use a data-driven approach to fix certain vulnerabilities first or extend the timeframe in the agreement.

Issues during SLAs Construction

Wrong vulnerability management is the root of unachievable SLA. The executives often set wrong expectations from their developers because they did not smartly manage all their vulnerabilities. The issue might arise from the wrong prioritization of vulnerabilities.

Above all, executives are also pressured to fix certain vulnerabilities before hackers find and use exploits. Hence, they often rush into fixing all major issues at once by setting wrong expectations based on faulty matrices. 

Why get SLA?

SLAs give a clear direction to the counterparts who are working to resolve an issue or solve a specific problem. According to industry research and Phoenix Security data, it normally takes between 180-290 days to remediate all vulnerabilities on a corporate network. 

Companies aim for high-risk vulnerabilities first, and it certainly shortens your time to fix the flaws. An SLA is effective to set the time interval for fixing vulnerabilities, but executives should use a data-driven approach to decide all factors of the agreement including service, time intervals, obligations and penalties.

It allows clarifying expectations and sets established standards for developers and other counterparts who are working to fix or patch certain high-risk vulnerabilities. A data-drive SLA is always an effective way to make developers focus better on their work rather than in internal debates.

Evidence-Based SLAs

All service-level agreements should be backed by some kind of evidence that could potentially ease the developers. This evidence is often data-driven. A normal organization only has the capacity to fix 1 out of 10 vulnerabilities. Organizations often debate over which vulnerabilities should be fixed under the SLA and these internal debates divert the attention of developers.

Today’s risk management platforms have real-time insight into mean time to remediation (MTTR) and mean time to exploit (MTTE), allowing them to provide SLA assurance recommendations that directly tie to an organization’s risk appetite. The lower an organization’s risk tolerance, the faster it will have to remediate.

Using Risk-Based SLAs

Risk-based SLAs might be the effective option for executives who are willing to support their dev teams. Companies need to assess their risk category before they determine any components of their agreement. These Risk-Based Factors are categorized as:

  • Low Risk — A company having capabilities to remediate vulnerabilities extremely fast.
  • Medium Risk — A company that wants to remediate on a faster pace than their previous performance.
  • High-Risk — A company with the lowest risk tolerance, that wants to remediate vulnerabilities as quickly as possible before a hacker finds and exploits those flaws.

The Risk-Based SLAs allow organizations to assess their risk tolerance levels. It also helps analyze two other major factors, such as the prioritization of assets upon which SLA is being set. These variables are combined to determine the timeframe recommendation for the SLA based on their risk. If executives also rely on these factors for their SLAs then it can really help developers to fix issues while meeting all the expectations.

AppSec Phoenix’s Risk Solution – Risk Indication for SLAs

AppSec Phoenix offers real-time risk-based indicators to help executives make informed decisions and develop better SLAs to support developers who act to fix those vulnerabilities. 

According to Bakermckenzie survey, the greatest third-party risks companies face in their supply chains are the insolvency of key suppliers partners and data/cybersecurity. 

We have got you covered from all third-party supply chain risks by providing detailed insights under our single pane of glass to give you an overall review of threats. Also, we provide a single aggregation point across multiple platforms to easily identify and remediate vulnerabilities. 

Bottom Line

Executives can use risk indicators to construct better SLAs for developers who work to resolve certain vulnerabilities in expected timeframes. Also, evidence-based SLAs are necessary to manage vulnerabilities effectively. Otherwise, attackers may find and exploit potential threats due to bad vulnerability management and unachievable expectations from developers. 

The Phoenix Security Way

With Appsec phoenix you can set your policy based targets and see where the organization is in comparison to internal and external industry targets. Check where your organization is and how to improve application security with the most advanced frictionless platform, get an Phoenix Security demo today and try it yourself

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
The team at Phoenix Security pleased to bring you another set of new application security (ASPM) features and improvements for vulnerability management across application and cloud security engines. This release builds on top of previous releases with key additions and progress across multiple areas of the platform. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Enhancements • New Weighted Asset Risk Formula – Refined risk aggregation for tailored vulnerability management. • Auto-Approval of Risk Exceptions – Accelerate mitigation by automating security approvals. • Enhanced Risk Explorer & Business Unit Insights – Monitor and analyze risk exposure by business units for better prioritization. Vulnerability & Asset Management • Link Findings to Existing Tickets – Seamless GitHub, ServiceNow, and Azure DevOps integration. • Multi-Finding Ticketing for ADO – Group multiple vulnerabilities in a single ticket for better workflow management. • Filter by Business Unit, CWE, Ownership, and Deployment Environment – Target vulnerabilities with precision using advanced filtering. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Security Enhancements • Cyber Threat Intelligence Premium – Access 128,000+ exploits for better exploitability and fixability metrics. • SBOM, Container SBOM & Open Source Artifact Analysis – Conduct deep security analysis with reachability insights. • Enhanced Lacework Container Management – Fetch and analyze running container details for better security reporting. • REST API Enhancements – Use asset tags for automated deployments and streamline security processes. Other Key Updates • CVE & CWE Columns Added – Compare vulnerabilities more effectively. • Custom Status Management for Findings – Personalize security workflows with custom status configurations. • Impact & Risk Explorer Side Panel – Gain heatmap-based insights into vulnerability distribution and team risk impact. 🚀 Stay ahead of vulnerabilities, optimize risk assessment, and enhance security efficiency with Phoenix Security’s latest features! 🚀
Alfonso Eusebio
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO