New USA National Cybersecurity Strategy – How does it apply to application security

USA National Cybersecurity Strategy
Five Pillars of the National Cybersecurity Strategy

The new Cybersecurity Strategy is out and pointed towards the actionable target at the beginning and more strategic direction at the end. 

The powerful investment of the USA towards cybersecurity is relatively straightforward, with CISA growing more and more central in the legislative phase. 

The Biden administration is investing $65 billion in protecting critical national infrastructure and secure access to connectivity. 

This document follows the Executive Order on improving the national cybersecurity in May 2021

Overall the cybersecurity strategy looks very promising and is oriented to an actionable direction. The overall increase in attention to software, open source vulnerabilities, SBOM and threat intelligence availability to businesses is evident throughout the document. 

Brief: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/03/02/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-national-cybersecurity-strategy/ 

Full document: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/National-Cybersecurity-Strategy-2023.pdf 

Some emerging trends are well-recognized, like the direction of complex technologies. 

Specifically, there is the recognition in point 3.3 of software’s growing complexity and vulnerabilities’ evolution. The Biden administration is encouraging disclosure of vulnerabilities, development of SBOM and possibly VEX. 

At the end of the document, there is also a pointed consideration of Log4J vulnerability in 2022, recognising this vulnerability is the most significant cybersecurity incident. 

Nice to see also in point 5.1 the international collaboration of the USA with more countries, specifically the USA with the AKUSA pact between the USA, Australia, and the USA. 

Let’s break down the main points

1. Defend Critical Infrastructure 

1.1 Expanding the use of minimum cybersecurity requirements in critical sectors to ensure national security and public safety and harmonising regulations to reduce the burden of compliance;

1.2 Scaling public-private collaboration: Enabling public-private collaboration at the speed and scale necessary to defend critical infrastructure and essential services; and,

1.3 Integrate Federal Cybersecurity Centres –  Defending and modernising Federal networks and updating Federal incident response policy

1.4 Update Federal Cyber Incident response plan and processes

1.5 Modernize federal defences

This section is pointed at strengthening the cybersecurity posture of CNI (Critical National Infrastructure) and prioritising threat intelligence and notification with the CISA advisory. CISA and CISA-KEV have taken a strong position in this part and the position on fixing critical vulnerabilities CISA BOD 22-01 

The second section focuses more on protecting against threat actors and deploying countermeasures. 

2. Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors

2.1 Strategically employing all tools of national power to disrupt adversaries; 

2.2 Engaging the private sector in disruption activities through scalable mechanisms; and, 

2.3 Addressing the ransomware threat through a comprehensive Federal approach and in lockstep with our international partners.

2.4 Prevent abuse of US-based infrastructure like domain registers, critical infrastructure 

2.5 Conter cybercrime focusing on defeating ransomware

Very strong focus on vulnerability resolution and ransomware protection with the Joint Ransomware Task Force JRTF and the collaboration between CISA and the FBI. 

Pillar 3  focuses more on the wider market and building a cyber-resilient future. It is nice as well to see here vulnerability remediation, application security in the form of software security and more accountability following the recent SEC Proposed Cyber Legislation 

3. Shape Market Forces to Drive Security and Resilience


3.1 Promoting privacy and the security of personal data;

3.2 Shifting liability for software products and services to promote secure development practices; and,

3.3 Ensuring that Federal grant programs promote investments in new infrastructure that are secure and resilient.

3.4 Federal grants to incentivise the building of security 

3.5 Leverage Federal Procurement to improve accountability

3.6 Incentivise the federal cyber insurance backstop – interesting to see the position on cyber security legislation and support for cyber insurance 

That is an interesting point, and we will see with the upcoming legislation what role the board will have in being accountable for cybersecurity in recent SEC Proposed Cyber Legislation 

The fourth pillar focus on future investment and reaction to cybersecurity attacks. This section focuses more on the investment in the cybersecurity sector and future.

4. Invest in a Resilient Future 

4.1 Reducing systemic technical vulnerabilities in the foundation of the Internet and across the digital ecosystem while making it more resilient against transnational digital repression;

4.2 Prioritizing cybersecurity R&D for next-generation technologies such as postquantum encryption, digital identity solutions, and clean energy infrastructure; and,

4.3 Prepare for Post-Quantum Future and investment in R&D and reaction from cyber resistant algorithms 

4.4 secure, clean energy future

4.5 support the development of a digital identity ecosystem 

4.6 develop a national strategy to strengthen the cybersecurity workforce

Point 4 is crucial for vulnerability resolution and management, with application security and software security taking centre stage and more presence. Aside from action from R&D and a clear commitment of financing to CISA, there are no more details on the R&D deployment.

There is also mention in 4.3 of post-quantum security future, during the early stage and very fluffy. 

5. Forge International Partnerships to Pursue Shared Goals –

5.1 Leveraging international coalitions and partnerships among like-minded nations to counter threats to our digital ecosystem through joint preparedness, response, and cost imposition;

5.2 Increasing the capacity of our partners to defend themselves against cyber threats, both in peacetime and in crisis; and,

5.3 Working with our allies and partners to make secure, reliable, and trustworthy global supply chains for information and communications technology and operational technology products and services.

5.4 build a coalition to reinforce global norms of responsible state behaviour 

5.5 secure global supply chain for information communication and operational technology product and services.

Conclusion

The document is strategically oriented to a more secure world and practically defends the critical infrastructure. Builds on the existing executive orders, the SEC proposal on creating a more accountable board and overall the direction of each department to have a more robust cybersecurity defence against software security threats and national state. 

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, the need for a more proactive and comprehensive approach to vulnerability management is undeniable. A threat-centric methodology, when combined with advanced tools like Agentic AI and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), offers organizations the ability to predict and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited by threat actors. This article delves into how leveraging threat intelligence, exposure and reachability analysis, and contextual risk assessments can help organizations stay ahead of cyber threats, specifically focusing on high-risk vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE) and memory corruption. Through case studies like Citrix ADC and MOVEit Transfer, the article highlights the growing trend of zero-day exploits and emphasizes the importance of a proactive, data-driven security strategy. In a world where vulnerabilities are constantly targeted, adopting a threat-centric approach is not just a best practice—it’s essential to ensuring long-term security. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO