New Features – November 2022

AppSec Phoenix Oct Nov release
OCT NOV Release Phoenix Security

The Cloud Security and AppSec teams of Phoenix Security Cloud are pleased to bring you another batch of functional additions and improvements. This release is packed full of key additions across multiple platform areas.

We are sure that you’ll find these quite interesting!

  • Explore your Assets and Posture
    • Pre-fetch assets & vulns from integrated scanners
    • Quick Time-to-value: Default App & Envs
    • Asset Screens: add asset type-specific filters
    • Enhanced hierarchy navigation and summaries
    • Display unassigned assets in the Assets pages
  • Risk and business modelling
    • Flexible definition of components in Apps and Envs
    • Improved Risk Formula: ACT-ON
    • Transfer of locality from Environment to App
    • Asset Locality based on Rules
    • Improved import of Assets and Vulnerabilities
  • Integrations
    • Sonatype IQ server
    • SonarQube

However, this time around, we are releasing these features as part of a preview initiative. Customers interested in getting their hands on these enhancements and additions can register using the form at the bottom of this post.

Explore your Assets and Posture

Pre-fetch assets & vulns from integrated scanners

We strive to provide value to our users as soon as they use the platform. To do this, we have changed how we interact with their scanners. We start pre-fetching asset and vulnerability information as soon as the scanner credentials are configured on the platform. This allows us to start modelling the organisation’s state within minutes of sign-up, presenting an initial overview of assets and vulnerabilities and the organisation’s risks as soon as they are fetched from the scanners.

Quick Time-to-value: Default App & Envs

Leveraging the above point is one of the latest additions to the platform: the automatic creation of Default Applications and Environments to capture any and all assets that are not included in user-defined components. This provides several benefits:

  • As soon as users connect to their scanners, the platform captures those assets into the Default components, providing a complete – if still not fully modelled – view of the organisation’s risk posture and security landscape.
  • As users start carving out parts of the assets into their Apps and Envs, the default components still ensure that non-assigned assets’ impact is still considered when calculating the organisation’s risk posture.
  • Furthermore, since Default components are just like normal ones (almost), they can be navigated and configured similarly.

Enhanced hierarchy navigation and summaries

With our Risk Explorer now, it’s easier than ever to navigate from the Application or Environment down to the individual asset and back.

Additionally, our Overview pages for these navigation levels have been improved and completed with consistent information and charts that focus on the item the user is interested in.

Display unassigned assets in the Assets pages

Now Applications and Environments are modelled by selecting flexible lists of assets that naturally map to the organisational view of the security landscape (see “Flexible definition of components in Apps and Envs” below).

However, it is important not to lose sight of those assets that are not yet mapped to any App or Env. That’s why our asset screens allow users to focus on “unassigned” assets to understand where the gap is.

Not only that, but when looking at all the assets, we mark every asset with a flag to indicate if it’s assigned.

Risk and Business Modelling

Flexible definition of components in Apps and Envs

One of the key evolutions of the platform has been breaking the scanner’s target boundaries. The organisation’s business applications and teams are not organised in line with the scanner’s view of the world, nor should their representation in the platform. Using flexible matching (or filtering) rules, users can define exactly what set of assets form part of a component or service – allowing them to model their state in whichever way best fits their organisation.

Improved Risk Formula: ACT-ON

Evolution of our risk calculation to the current ACT-ON risk formula – Actionable Contextualized Threat. In previous posts, we discussed the former ARCTIQ (now ACT-ON Risk). Still, it’s important to highlight how we’ve evolved our risk calculation to better reflect the vulnerabilities and assets’ context and provide real-time actionable and quantifiable information that leverages threat intelligence sources. For example, exploitability information like EPSS plays an important role in determining the effective risk score of a vulnerability and hence the assets and components that contain it.

Cloud Security Phoenix Act on risk formula

Transfer of locality from Environment to App

One of the cornerstones of our platform has always been the correlation of AppSec with Cloud and Infra, helping organisations get the proper context for their product vulnerabilities by ensuring that application vulnerabilities are evaluated within the context of where they run. This is why our risk calculation logic considers where applications are deployed and “transfers” the locality factor of the environment (how internal or external it is) to the deployed application.

Asset Locality based on Rules

With locality being such an important factor, we want to ensure that our users can easily define the value of the factor for every asset in the state. This provides a flexible and powerful way to set the locality value of an asset using rules based on its tags, IP address or any other attribute it might have. And, since there is always a common case, users can define the default value for all assets that are not matched by any explicit rule. All assets are always accounted for.

Improved import of Assets and Vulnerabilities

We place a big emphasis on automatic asset and vulnerability retrieval through native API integrations with scanners. However, there will always be weaknesses discovered through a manual process, whether regular pentests or ad-hoc security reviews. And we want to ensure that those vulnerabilities can seamlessly be integrated with those provided by scanners. This is why asset and vulnerability import is a key feature in Cloud Security Phoenix, with dedicated screens to define “assessments” (or engagements) and to keep track of previous imports. All this ensures that imported information is fully integrated into the platform’s features and flows.

Integrations

Sonatype IQ server

Users can now take advantage of the vulnerability reports created by Sonatype IQ Infra by using our native integration with the scanning platform.

SonarQube

Additionally, users can integrate with their SonarQube instances to retrieve vulnerability reports through the native API of the server.

Conclusion

This is a big release with a plethora of significant additions and improvements. Register now if you want to be the first to enjoy these features in preview mode.

Alfonso brings experience running international teams for multi-million dollar, technologically advanced projects for Telefónica, IBM and Vodafone. Alfonso joins with two decades of experience working for tech leaders, including at Dell EMC, Yahoo! and Intershop.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO