New Features – February 2023 – Vulnerability Management Improvement

AppSec Phoenix February Release

The Cloud Security and AppSec teams at Phoenix Security are pleased to bring you another series of functionalities for vulnerability management and improvements. This release builds on top of our recent V3 release with key additions and improvements across multiple areas of the platform.

We are sure that you’ll find these quite interesting!

  • Manage your Vulnerabilities and Assets
    • Provide additional details in the vulnerability tickets.
    • Improve timing and SLA information in the Vulnerabilities list.
    • Update Risk Elements and Impact information display.
    • Evolve reporting functionality
  • Risk and business modelling
    • Add domain (FQDN) to the set of filters in Software context rules.
    • Updated risk formula better captures Application criticality
  • Integrations
    • Ability to select scanner targets when creating integrations
    • Notify users if they reach their asset license limit
    • Outbound asset API (preview)
  • Other improvements and features
    • Improve progress feedback in the frontend
    • Update 3-rd party dependencies in line with security policies

Manage your Vulnerabilities and Assets across application security and cloud security

Provide additional details in the vulnerability tickets

We want to make engineers’ live as easy as possible, and one important part of that is ensuring that they can continue working with their everyday tools while enjoying the benefits of Phoenix Security.

In this release, we have increased the details included in the issue tickets created by Phoenix Security so that engineers don’t have to leave their favourite workflow tools to gather information about the vulnerability and its resolution. There are still some links to extended information that we include in the ticket, but the key data should now be present directly in the ticket description.

Improve timing and SLA information in the Vulnerabilities list

In an information-rich platform like Phoenix Security times, it’s challenging to balance the level of detail and clean user interfaces. However, we keep trying to hit the sweet spot, and this time we have focused on the timing and SLA information displayed on the Vulnerabilities page.

Now you have a consolidated view of the time that a vulnerability has been open and it’s ticket created while receiving clear indication and details of the status of the vulnerability with regards to defined SLAs.

New SLA Timer Screen

Update Risk Elements and Impact information display.

With the improvement of the risk formula during our V3 release cycle, we introduced and updated adjustment factors at different levels of the calculation. In line with those changes, we are updating our information display to reflect better the key elements that conform to the risk calculation.

New Contextual Risk formula screen

Evolve reporting functionality

Phoenix Security is primarily a real-time risk exploration platform; however, there are times when a snapshot report is necessary for external communication. We are in the process of updating our PDF reporting infrastructure and have, temporarily removed this feature from the front until it’s fully updated.

Risk and Business Modelling

Improved filters in Software context rules

Now you can use the domain name (FQDN) as part of the Context Rules for software assets. These rules make it easy to define the locality (Internal, External, DMZ) of assets based on their attributes.

New Application Security Domain Contextual Rules

Updated risk formula better captures Application criticality

In our constant quest to refine our risk calculation, we have adjusted the weight and range that the application criticality (impact) factor has on vulnerability risk. This ensures that vulnerabilities affecting critical applications get a larger risk uplift, in line with expectations.

Integrations

Ability to select scanner targets when creating integrations

Phoenix Security is all about gathering and consolidating any assets and vulnerabilities your organisation is already detecting through scanners. However, there are times when some of the projects or targets included in the scanning are not relevant for day-to-day vulnerability and risk management.

This is where another of our key principles comes into play: avoid noise and duplication. And with this release, users can select exactly which scanner targets (projects, applications, etc.) are ingested by our engine. This is as simple as selecting to fetch all targets, only those specifically selected or all of them except for a few exclusions, whatever suits your use case.

Notify users if they reach their asset license limit

With the release of V3, much of the interaction with the scanners happens asynchronously in the background. This is necessary in order to properly manage the volumes of data that our clients have, but it makes feedback loops a bit more complicated.

With this release, we have included a notification event whenever a client reaches their licensed asset limit during a background operation. The user will receive an email as well as an on-screen notification.

Outbound asset API (preview)

As a technical preview, we are releasing the initial implementation of our outbound API. If you are interested in this feature, please let us know so we can guide you through your specific use case.

Other improvements and features

Improve progress feedback in the frontend.

We are continuously working on improving our user’s experience, and this time around, we have focused on the “interaction feedback loop”. When our users interact with Phoenix Security’s front end, it’s essential that they know when the platform is working to provide the results of each interaction: vulnerability lists, data updates, etc. These might seem like a secondary feature of the platform, but letting the user know when she has to wait for a page or data refresh avoids confusion. Fortunately, these feedback elements (e.g. loading spinners) don’t spend too long on our screens!

Update 3-rd party dependencies in line with security policies

We are constantly updating our frameworks and libraries to ensure that they are free of vulnerabilities. Most of the time, these are just minor updates (patches) to individual components.

In this release, it was the turn of one of our key frameworks to get a significant update. This will ensure that we work with the latest and better-maintained version of the framework.

Get in control of your Application Security posture and Vulnerability management

Alfonso brings experience running international teams for multi-million dollar, technologically advanced projects for Telefónica, IBM and Vodafone. Alfonso joins with two decades of experience working for tech leaders, including at Dell EMC, Yahoo! and Intershop.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

We don’t need more tools. We need a new way of thinking. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) promises the world, but most teams crumble under tool sprawl, silos, and endless ticket queues. That’s why I built IronClad™ — a brutally simple, brutally effective operating model that fuses ASPM with decentralized ownership and ruthless clarity. This isn’t theory. It’s how security teams can actually win: small empowered squads, zero ambiguity, and mission-first remediation. If you’re tired of drowning in dashboards and ready to rethink how your teams build, secure, and scale, this is the blueprint. 👉 Read how ASPM + IronClad™ flips the script on vulnerability management.
Phil Moroni
As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, the need for a more proactive and comprehensive approach to vulnerability management is undeniable. A threat-centric methodology, when combined with advanced tools like Agentic AI and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), offers organizations the ability to predict and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited by threat actors. This article delves into how leveraging threat intelligence, exposure and reachability analysis, and contextual risk assessments can help organizations stay ahead of cyber threats, specifically focusing on high-risk vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE) and memory corruption. Through case studies like Citrix ADC and MOVEit Transfer, the article highlights the growing trend of zero-day exploits and emphasizes the importance of a proactive, data-driven security strategy. In a world where vulnerabilities are constantly targeted, adopting a threat-centric approach is not just a best practice—it’s essential to ensuring long-term security. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept