What is the cost of manual vulnerability management? Is manual triage of application security and cloud security the best way?

Time Effort & Cost of Vulnerability management Programme big

Vulnerabilities and the problem of scale for cloud and application security

Vulnerability management is the system or process of identifying, evaluating, treating, and reporting security vulnerabilities in systems and the software that runs on them. 

Security professionals triage vulnerabilities daily and face the challenge of too many alerts coming from all parts of the organization and technology stacks.

According to the Verizon Data Breach investigation report, Vulnerabilities mismanagement is one of the four factors that leads to vulnerabilities. 

According to research from the Ponemon Institute, 53% of companies spend more time navigating manual processes than responding to vulnerabilities.

Credit: EPSS – 35% more CVE declared yearly (source EPSS)

With the current trend of 35% more CVE declared yearly and security teams being unable to cope with the stress and quitting, 54% of security professionals are considering a career change; it is ever more important to focus on the vulnerabilities that matter most.

The cost of the vulnerability management lifecycle is done manually

Challenges in a vulnerability landscape
Challenges in a vulnerability landscape

The cost of manually running a vulnerability management system is far greater than what organizations realize. 

By triaging manually, the security operation team can scale to a maximum of one security professional to 10 development teams. 

On average, a security triage consists of 

  • Analysing the organization’s applications
  • Performing a threat assessment
  • Identifying the source of vulnerabilities across 3-4 security scanners
  • Review the latest security pentest

Only those efforts require days of research with an average of 570 minutes and 9.5 fully dedicated hours of work for each application daily. 

Schedule a call with us

Schedule a Call

This cost and time grow higher considering the number of applications/teams required 

Why is it this complex to analyse and triage vulnerabilities? Challenges come from not well-documented organisational structure, absent ownership information, and multiple vulnerability reports that need to be correlated, contextualized and quantified. The picture below provides an overview of the elements considered for each vulnerability report. 

Download here the infographic that explains the true cost of triaging and how much it costs to triage vulnerabilities manually

Time Effort & Cost of Vulnerability management Programme
Time Effort & Cost of Vulnerability Management Programme

Check out Phoenix Pricing

The number of security professionals required to triage vulnerabilities

Let’s take, as an example, a small to medium organization with 100-200 developers; not all developers will need assistance at times but for the sake of argument, let’s assume so. To cover the manual triage of 100 development teams, you would require at least 5-10 Security professionals to achieve a ratio of 1:20 to 1:10 security professionals to developers. The average annual salary for a mid-level vulnerability management consultant in the UK is £40,000; in the US, it’s $75,000. To cover an organization with 100 developers, you would need an average of 400,000 in the UK and 750,000 $ in the US. 

Health Cost

Source: ThreatConnect 

Burnout and triage fatigue is a real problem and is claiming the health of many security professionals starting to consider a different career due to burnout and loss.

According to a recent article from Gartner, more than a third of cybersecurity professionals are considering quitting their jobs. 

Recent research from Acutec, UK businesses lose an average of 4.3 days a year per employee to sick absents due to burnout – an average of £554 per employee. For a team of 10, that’s £5,540 just on sick days. 

As the team is absent, triaging and prioritizing the vulnerability is left unattended. This increases the probability of exploitation as the average time from discovery to exploitation is seven days. 

Cybersecurity Skill Shortage Challenge

Cybersecurity most in-demand skill shortage

On top of the cost recruiting for security roles is increasingly difficult. Half (49%) of all cyber firms have faced problems with technical cyber security skills gaps, either among existing staff or among job applicants, according to a recent UK Government study on skill gaps. With Security engineers (35% demand)  and security analysts (18%) being the most in-demand job accessing the right talent, retaining it is a key tactic to keep your business safe. 

Risk Potential breach and cost 

It is always difficult to put a cost of vulnerability exploitation or business interruption. According to IBM, the global average data breach cost is a hefty $4.24 million.

What’s the solution?

Phoenix offers a way to scale triaging and prioritizing vulnerabilities, removing the manual part of security analysis and enabling the security team to scale better, from a 1:10 to 1:40 ratio, react faster (from 290 days average resolution time to 30) and be more efficient in the time spent on each vulnerability. 

With a proven methodology adopted by over 1000 Security professionals, Phoenix enables security engineers to communicate more effectively with the business regarding risk and loss and automatically prioritize vulnerabilities for developers.

How Can Phoenix Security Help

Appsec phoenix is a saas platform that ingests security data from multiple tools, cloud, applications, containers, infrastructure, and pentest.

The phoenix platform Deduplicate correlates, contextualises and shows risk profile and the potential financial impact of applications and where they run. 

The Phoenix platform enables the security team to scale, automate triage and focus on the tasks that require more attention and the triages that cannot be automated.

Phoenix also enables clearer risk-based communication between the development team and the rest of the business translating vulnerabilities into risk-based posture and position for applications and environments.

Check Phoenix Prices

Schedule a Call

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO