Brass Knuckle Security: Why ASPM Alone Isn’t Enough: Introducing IronClad™, a New Operating Model for Secure Enterprise Software Development

ASPM. IRoN BcIRON CLAD, Brass Knuckle Se

Background & Introduction

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) has become a buzzword in the cybersecurity space over the last few years, and for good reason. ASPM promises to unify fragmented AppSec tooling, visibility from code to cloud, reduce alert fatigue, provide context from operation to security and development teams, and give enterprises real-time visibility into software risk. But here’s the truth, most vendors in the space won’t tell you:

ASPM won’t work if your operating model is broken.

That’s why it’s time for something more profound, deeper, simpler, and a new way of thinking. This post explores a modern security framework I’m calling IronClad™ – a hybrid fusion of philosophies combining ASPM with two battle-tested operating models:

  1. Brutalist Cybersecurity – clarity over complexity. Function and form over extravagance and polish.
  2. Team of Teams – decentralized, empowered execution. Decision-making pushed to the edge.

By combining these philosophies with ASPM, we’re not just securing code. We’re rewiring how organizations build, ship, and protect digital products of all kinds.

I owe a huge shoutout to a CISO I recently interacted with from a major Fortune 500 company. This post diving into these two topics is what prompted me to start down this journey of operating models and what the “why” is behind all of this. 


What is Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)?

At its core, ASPM is a platform category designed to aggregate, normalize, and prioritize security findings across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). It’s a human-centric phrase that I believe is more important than the other “SPM”-based acronyms (DSPM, CSPM, etc.…).

It integrates with:

  • SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, and other scanning tools
  • CI/CD pipelines
  • Asset inventories and code repositories
  • Ticketing systems and remediation workflows

The goal? To correlate vulnerabilities to business risk, route them to the right teams, and measure remediation effectiveness in a quicker, more real-time fashion. 

But, even the best ASPM solution can’t succeed in an enterprise plagued by:

  • Tool sprawl
  • Siloed teams
  • Unclear ownership
  • Missing context
  • Bureaucratic remediation loops

Sound familiar? This is where IronClad™ comes in.


What is IronClad™? A Framework for Modern Application Security

IronClad™ is a term I’m using to describe a return to the fundamentals of cybersecurity and building an operating model based on common sense. It’s a blend of:

  • Brutalist Security: A security approach that focuses on raw functionality, minimalism, and durability.
  • Team of Teams (inspired by Gen. Stanley McChrystal): Small, empowered squads operating with shared consciousness and decentralized decision-making.

Why “Iron” and “Clad”?

  • Iron represents structure, accountability, and immovable clarity.
  • Clad, meaning covered or encased, represents adaptability, real-time information flow, and interconnectedness.

IronClad™ turns traditional security programs into agile, mission-driven ecosystems. When paired with ASPM, it creates the infrastructure for real change, not just in tooling, but in behavior.


The Problem with Traditional Application Security

Modern applications break because security isn’t built in from day zero: Ideation, design, and architecture all matter but, it’s bolted on later, if at all. That delay creates friction, blind spots, and structural weaknesses:

  • Security tools send alerts – nobody truly knows who owns what and where things really reside.
  • Vulnerabilities are tracked in spreadsheets or disconnected ticketing systems and legacy methods.
  • Devs are overwhelmed with false positives, causing them to not care, not innovate, and not fix what needs to be fixed.
  • Remediation efforts stall because context is missing in a business-related way to give priority to the fix.

Most people think they have a vulnerability problem when the average organization I’ve seen actually has large set coordination problems. You may have thousands of criticals and highs. But how do you know which ones to solve to give you the biggest bang for your buck and reduce your risk the fastest and best?


ASPM + IronClad™: A New Operating Model for Application Security

Let’s talk implementation for a second. Here’s what I believe can happen when ASPM (The Tech System of Truth) and IronClad™ (The Management Philosophy) come together:

1. Unified Visibility and Ownership

  • ASPM ingests all signals and maps them to applications, environments, business units, and teams.
  • IronClad™ creates small security squads (“teams”) responsible for specific digital missions (e.g., Payments, Mobile App, Internal APIs).

Key elements: Secure design and architecture, application risk visibility, asset ownership, DevSecOps teams

2. Context-Aware Prioritization

  • ASPM correlates vulnerabilities to business context: CVSS score, exploitability, data sensitivity, asset value, etc…
  • IronClad™ ensures these insights go to the right teams with the authority to act.

Key elements: contextual vulnerability management based on risk and the ability to recover promptly.

3. Decentralized, Risk-based SLA-Second Remediation

  • ASPM automates ticket creation, progress tracking, and feedback loops across Jira, GitHub, or ServiceNow.
  • IronClad™ teams own remediation and mitigation workflows and empower devs to work with speed.

Key elements: application vulnerability remediation, security workflow automation, SLA tracking

4. Real-Time Reporting for Executives

  • ASPM will serve as the record system for AppSec performance and digital risk exposure.
  • IronClad™ promotes radical transparency – so everyone from engineers to CISO sees the same metrics (here’s an example of Brutalist Security metrics). It creates a unified language for everyone.

Key elements: AppSec KPIs, software risk dashboards, executive risk reporting


Real-World Impact: What This Looks Like in Action

I’m making an attempt to explain something that I’ve never explained before…Imagine a zero-day vulnerability hits your open-source dependency tree:

  • This method requires acknowledgement that there is simply no silver bullet to achieve this outcome; technology and asset ownership with continuous automation are key to making this work. If the asset/systems are not owned, remediation can’t be addressed by the right team.
  • ASPM can, if deployed correctly, slam visibility across repos and workloads, ranked by risk, not guesswork. It is critical to keep the owners up to date.
  • IronClad™ squads/teams activate on impact. Ownership and asset tier dictate who moves. No ambiguity – just direct links between critical systems and those accountable.
  • Remediation isn’t a ticket, it’s a mission. Patches hit target systems within hours based on criticality. No drift. No delay.
  • Security leadership doesn’t wait for reports. Real-time information shows where the gaps are, and who’s closing them. Accountability is visible. So is progress.

I believe that this is not a future-state fantasy. This is an achievable reality if you align people, tooling, and operating models respectively and lead with trust. It fundamentally changes how we build things. 


Common Pitfalls in ASPM & IronClad™ Adoption

When it comes to pitfalls we have to rethink this whole thing. You’re not just installing software – you’re building muscle with people who use tools to inspect software. Here’s what trips people up typically when they’re trying to do this, if they’re mature in their practices.  Common issues that stall out this transformation include:

  • Lack of executive sponsorship: You need top-down support to redesign the operating model, not just bottom-up implementation from a rogue AppSec team member.
  • No clear asset inventory, no developer-friendly ownershipry: ASPM can’t prioritize risk if your CMDB is broken… How’s yours looking?
  • Poor tagging discipline: Without tags for ownership and environment, IronClad™ collapses.
  • Over-reliance on silver bullet thinking: Tools can’t fix broken accountability structures. It’s human work that yes, AI can help you document better but shouldn’t be left for AI alone as the cure-all.

These are all big themes in digital transformation in general, but you really need to chart a course with discourse before trying to radically shift. Decide on standards, naming conventions, and organizational structure. Then, evaluate and consolidate your tools and processes with the guidance of your teams and people. 

Throughout my career, it’s been clear to me that businesses and organizations are reactive in this whole situation. We need to stop trying to band-aid the problem and rethink the entire approach and include leaders at every level in the shaping of the new way of thinking.


Why This Matters Now

Enterprise software is under siege:

  • AI is accelerating code velocity and risk; traditional tools won’t keep up with millions of lines of code automatically generated by AI. Blocking code in pipeline levels will not be possible anymore, blocking release would be the gating of the future.
  • Attack surfaces are expanding through microservices, APIs, and third-party code.
  • Traditional AppSec programs are being left behind to sift through noisy alerts with legacy tools and processes.
  • The number of CVEs keeps increasing by over 40K a year, with threats to the success of that program at a bureaucratic level.

ASPM gives you the visibility and prioritization layer you need to make decisions faster and more intelligently. 

IronClad™ gives you the agility and accountability framework to act on it at scale. 

Together, they offer something every security leader craves: Clarity in complexity. A center point for deriving insight and making informed decisions.


Final Thoughts: You Don’t Need Another Tool. You Need a New Model.

CISOs and security architects today are drowning in dashboards, alerts, pointless meetings, and general wastes of time. They’re focused on fixing rather than innovating.  The future of application security isn’t more signal noise. Rather, it’s an intelligent, orchestrated response aligned with your org structure and business priorities. 

If your current AppSec strategy feels like it’s held together with duct tape, consider this your invitation to rethink the operating model.

Start at the top. Leadership must treat security as structural, not optional. It’s not about uptime anymore – it’s about survivability. Without security embedded from the start, the foundation cracks. When it fails, it hits the business hard. And who suffers? The people.

Then, figure out whether ASPM is a good solution at the point in time you are in. Think of your business in terms of digital assets that are constantly going to be under threat and likely growing/changing. 

If it is time for you to look at ASPM, invest in creating and deploying an IronClad™ based solution. Or at least read up on these books and interpret how you will. Make new teams and get people excited about the minimalist and direct nature of this philosophy. Upskill them to learn new technologies. Encourage open communication and dialogue top to bottom, left to right. 

Build security that works, and overhaul what it means to have security in the board room, presenting around digital risk.

With that, I leave you to ponder these ideas and consider how they could be game-changing for you, your life, your team, your work fam, and your business. 

More to come as this unfolds. If you have questions, comments, or just want to engage in healthy human to human dialogue, let’s talk and have coffee. 

Until then, stay physically and digitally safe my friends! 

Phil


Appendix

TermDefinition
IronClad™A hybrid model combining Team of Teams and Security Brutalism for adaptive, decentralized, composable security operations.
CSC (Composable Security Cell)Embedded, autonomous team(s) with risk accountability and remediation capabilities.
SIM (Security Intelligence Mesh) Real-time visibility layer connecting vulnerability, context, and posture across teams.
IronDefaultsMandatory, hardened configuration rules and baselines.
Iron AgentsDevelopers, Engineers, and People working on fixing vulnerabilities.
Phil is an accomplished technology leader with a proven track record in business and cybersecurity across enterprise IT and cloud computing. Currently leading Sales in the usa for the AI Second ASPM company Phoenix Security. Previously a Senior Account Manager at Presidio, and formerly an Enterprise Account Executive at Softchoice, he has helped numerous organizations drive digital transformation and modernize their IT infrastructures. Beyond his client work, Phil actively contributes to the industry as a board member of the Cloud Security Alliance’s Charlotte chapter. He is also the author of Friday Tech News, a widely-read weekly newsletter that curates the latest developments in technology and cybersecurity for IT professionals and business leaders. His blend of technical expertise, industry leadership, and thought-provoking content has positioned him as a trusted advisor and recognized thought leader in the IT sector.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, the need for a more proactive and comprehensive approach to vulnerability management is undeniable. A threat-centric methodology, when combined with advanced tools like Agentic AI and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), offers organizations the ability to predict and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited by threat actors. This article delves into how leveraging threat intelligence, exposure and reachability analysis, and contextual risk assessments can help organizations stay ahead of cyber threats, specifically focusing on high-risk vulnerabilities like remote code execution (RCE) and memory corruption. Through case studies like Citrix ADC and MOVEit Transfer, the article highlights the growing trend of zero-day exploits and emphasizes the importance of a proactive, data-driven security strategy. In a world where vulnerabilities are constantly targeted, adopting a threat-centric approach is not just a best practice—it’s essential to ensuring long-term security. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO