Understanding the libcue Vulnerability CVE-2023-43641 in GNOME Linux Systems



Innocuous libraries can pose a significant threat. it’s crucial to keep an eye on potential threats. One such recent threat is the libcue CVE-2023-43641 vulnerability, which has put GNOME Linux systems, including Ubuntu, at risk of Remote Code Execution (RCE).

This flaw, tracked as CVE-2023-43641 with a CVSS score of 8.8, allows for once-click Remote Code Execution (RCE) on affected systems. In this blog post, we’ll delve into the details of this vulnerability, its implications, and what you need to know to stay protected.

 libcue, vulnerability, GNOME Linux systems, Ubuntu, Remote Code Execution, Vulnerability Management, Application Security,

One of my favourite memes, the world relies on a few tiny libraries

Who’s Involved? in disclosing libcue CVE-2023-43641

The GitHub Security Lab, in coordination with Ilya Lipnitskiy, the maintainer of libcue, and the distros mailing list, has disclosed this vulnerability. A text-only version of the disclosure was also sent to the oss-security list.

Systems affected by libcue2 CVE-2023-43641

 libcue, vulnerability, GNOME Linux systems, Ubuntu, Remote Code Execution, Vulnerability Management, Application Security,

The following systems are affected by this vulnerability, for an updated list:

  • Ubuntu Versions:
    • Ubuntu 23.04: libcue2 – 2.2.1-4ubuntu0.1
    • Ubuntu 22.04: libcue2 – 2.2.1-3ubuntu0.1
    • Ubuntu 20.04: libcue2 – 2.2.1-2ubuntu0.1
  • Other Systems:
    • Adélie 1.0
    • Alpine 3.18, 3.17, 3.16
    • ALT Linux P10, P9
    • Arch Linux
    • Enterprise Linux 9 (CentOS 9, RHEL 9, Rocky Linux 9, AlmaLinux 9)
    • Enterprise Linux 8 (CentOS 8, RHEL 8, Rocky Linux 8, AlmaLinux 8)
    • Enterprise Linux 7 (CentOS 7, RHEL 7)
    • Fedora 38, 37, Rawhide
    • FreeBSD 13, 12
    • NetBSD 9.3, 8.2
    • Slackware 15.0, Current
    • Solus
    • Void Linux

libcue Latest Versions: 2.2.1, 2.1.0, 1.4.0
libcue Architectures: aarch64, amd64, i686, x86_64
libcue Linux Packages: apk, eopkg, pkg, rpm, tgz, txz, xbps, xz, zst

What Does libcue Do and how CVE-2023-43641 affects?

libcue is a library designed for parsing cue sheets, which are metadata formats for describing CD tracks. It is a dependency for some audio players like Audacious and is incorporated into Tracker Miners, a search engine tool in GNOME.

How Does the CVE-2023-43641 Exploit Work?

The vulnerability arises from an out-of-bounds array access in the track_set_index function. An attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into clicking a malicious link and downloading a .cue file. The file is then automatically scanned by Tracker Miners, which uses libcue to parse it, leading to code execution.

How Remote Code Execution Occurs

The vulnerability is in the handling of the INDEX syntax in cue sheets. The bug is due to the use of atoi for scanning integers, which doesn’t check for integer overflow, and a lack of boundary checks in track_set_index. A patch has been proposed to fix this issue.

Vulnerability Exploitation Details & POC

CTI – 3.1 

EPSS – Not available

Exploit – PoC not widely Available

Affected Systems: Spotlight on Ubuntu

Among the systems impacted by this libcue vulnerability are various versions of Ubuntu:

  • Ubuntu 23.04: libcue2 – 2.2.1-4ubuntu0.1
  • Ubuntu 22.04: libcue2 – 2.2.1-3ubuntu0.1
  • Ubuntu 20.04: libcue2 – 2.2.1-2ubuntu0.1

Tracker Miners’ Role

Tracker Miners is not directly vulnerable but magnifies the impact of this bug. It consists of two processes: tracker-miner-fs and tracker-extract. The vulnerability only affects tracker-extract, which is where libcue is used. Both processes run as the current user, so chaining this vulnerability with a separate privilege escalation bug would be necessary for admin access.

For additional details check the Github Exploitation disclosure

Exploitation Challenges

The exploit had to bypass ASLR and a seccomp sandbox in tracker-extract. The sandbox has since been strengthened to prevent this exploitation path in the future.

Vulnerability Management and Application Security Measures

In the context of vulnerability management and application security, it’s essential to update your GNOME Linux systems and particularly libcue to the latest versions. This will mitigate the risk of Remote Code Execution.

What’s Being Done to fix CVE-2023-43641?

The full Proof of Concept (PoC) is being delayed to give users time to install updates. However, the vulnerability has been tested on Ubuntu 23.04 and Fedora 38, and it’s believed that all GNOME-running distributions are potentially exploitable.

Credit Github and video for exploit PoC

Final Thoughts

As the saying goes, “The devil is in the details,” and this vulnerability proves just that. What seemed like a small library issue turned into a one-click RCE due to its integration with Tracker Miners. So, if you’re using GNOME, don’t wait for a ‘cue’ to update—do it now, or you might find yourself calculating the risks later (literally, with a popped-up calculator).

How Phoenix Security Can Help Identify libcue Vulnerabilities in Your Products

Phoenix Security serves as a beacon for security professionals aiming to pinpoint the libcue2 vulnerability within their systems. It meticulously scans through your product, identifying instances where the libcurl vulnerability may be installed or nested within libraries. By leveraging Phoenix Security, you not only unravel the potential threats but also take a significant stride in vulnerability management, ensuring your application security remains unassailable against the libcue vulnerability.

Previous Issues of Vulnerability Weekly




Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO