Significance of Application Security in the Business world.

OWASP TOP 10

The internet age and globalization of operations have seen the adoption of computing infrastructure to better facilitate organizations and people’s business operations. To facilitate this, web applications are used as the primary means of accessing and manipulating data distributed over various data centres. 

Despite their obvious advantages, security concerns remain as their major hurdle towards their full adoption. What are some of these vulnerabilities, and can they be addressed?

WEB APPLICATION VULNERABILITIES

A vulnerability is a weakness or hole in an application’s design that may be exploited by an attacker to cause harm to the application’s stakeholders. A stakeholder is any entity that relies on the application in any form.

The Open Web Application Security Project, a non-profit organization dealing with web application security, lists ten vulnerabilities that plague web applications.

  1. Injection. This is a weakness that allows the addition of untrusted data sent to the application’s interpreter sent as part of a command or query. This allows the attacker to be able to access unauthorized data or execute restricted commands on the application.
  2. Broken Authentication. This is a weakness in the authentication procedures that allows an attacker to masquerade as another entity through misconfigured session keys and passwords. This allows an attacker to assume another person’s identity temporarily or permanently.
  3. Sensitive Data Exposure. Web applications may not properly secure user data either in transit or at rest. This will allow an attacker to steal sensitive data to commit credit card fraud, identity theft, or other malicious activities. 
  4. XML External Entities (XXE). Poorly configured or older XML processors allow for the execution of external XML entities within scripts. These external entities can determine application structure and carry out attack vectors such as the denial of service attacks and internal port scanning.
  5. Broken Access Control. Attackers can exploit improper enforcement of what authenticated users can access and carry out on a web application. An attacker can use these to view sensitive data on user accounts, modify user’s data, and access sensitive files. 
  6. Security Misconfiguration. This is usually the result of using default configurations, incomplete configurations, misconfigured HTTP headers, and error messages containing sensitive information. All web application dependencies such as libraries, frameworks, and operating systems must be properly configured and upgraded in a timely manner to ensure the most up to date settings are used.
  7. Cross-Site Scripting XSS. XSS vulnerabilities occur when a web application uses user-supplied input as an output on a new web page without proper validation and sanitization. Cross-site scripting allows a malicious attacker to execute JavaScript code on the user’s browser, which can be used to hijack user sessions, steal sensitive data such as login credentials and redirect users to malicious websites.
  8. Insecure Deserialization. Deserialization is the process of converting data from a file or stream and rebuilding it into an object. Insecure deserialization is a vulnerability where untrusted or malicious data is used to exploit an application’s logic to carry out attacks. It can be used to perform attacks, including replay attacks, injection attacks, and privilege escalation attacks, or carry out remote code execution or denial of service attacks.
  9. Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities. Components of web applications such as libraries and frameworks run with similar privileges as the application. Attackers can exploit the use of these components with known vulnerabilities to compromise a web application. Should they be exploited, they can cause untold damage to the application’s infrastructure and data, and these may undermine all other security policies that have been implemented in the application.
  10. Insufficient Logging & Monitoring. A web application needs to be constantly monitored and logged in order to prevent repeat attacks and stop attacks such as a denial of service and session hijacking. In most cases, the time taken to detect attacks is normally more than 200 days on average and is usually done by external parties to the target organization. 

CONTINUOUS TESTING VS PENTESTING.

Two schools of thought are primarily considered to counter web application vulnerabilities, continuous testing and pen-testing. Continuous testing is the continuous testing of its creators’ application to ensure all security concerns have been addressed. At the same time, pen-testing is usually carried out by an external party to circumvent the existing security policies implemented on the application. While pen-testing is considered the most ideal as an external party will most likely find something overlooked, it is far more costly. There is a risk of sensitive data exposure to untrusted parties.  

How does one optimise for continuous testing?

Continuous testing is carried out early, regularly, and everywhere. In a continuous testing process, testing is done undisrupted continuously moving the software continuously from development, testing to deployment. This allows the development team to find the risk, address it, and improve the final product quality. In order to properly secure an application, continuous testing should be carried out in every stage of the computer development pipeline. Test suites should be set up at every point the web application code changes, merges, or is released. This allows the development team to run tests at specific points rather than running all the tests at once.

In order to carry this out, teams need to add additional modern testing practices in the form of minute quality checks. These checks are carried out throughout the application pipeline allowing for small sections of code in the application to be tested throughout the application’s development pipeline. Test automation should not be the first thing tacked due to test dependencies, which have to be satisfied before execution. 

This can be solved by dividing the process into two stages: continuous integration and continuous testing. In continuous integration, rather than waiting for all developers to commit their code, the code is merged into the main branch, built, and tested in a virtualized environment. This saves time in moving from the development environment to the testing environment. Should the test fail, the issues are reported back to the developers, and the process is repeated continuously until the production build is completed.

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO