What is the Difference Between Security Risk Management & Security Compliance

Security Risk management and the various areas it covers
Security Risk management and the various areas

As organizations increasingly rely on technology to store and process sensitive information, the importance of cybersecurity cannot be overstated. Many organisations implement security risk management and compliance strategies to protect against potential threats and maintain a secure environment.

While these two approaches may seem similar, they are distinct concepts with different purposes and processes. Understanding the difference between security risk management and security compliance is crucial for organizations looking to safeguard their assets and data effectively. 

This article will explore the key differences between security risk management and security compliance and how understanding these differences can help organizations improve their security posture.

Security Risk Management — Defined

Security risk management is identifying and mitigating potential threats to an organization. It involves the continuous assessment and evaluation of risks and implementing measures to prevent or mitigate them. 

Purpose

The primary purpose of security risk management is to identify and mitigate potential organisational threats. This involves continuously assessing the organization’s vulnerabilities and implementing measures to reduce the likelihood and impact of potential security breaches. This could include implementing strong passwords, securing network infrastructure, and training employees on cybersecurity best practices.

The goal of security risk management is to protect the organization from harm. This includes physical harms, such as damage to facilities or equipment, and financial harm, such as the loss of sensitive data or the cost of recovering from a security breach.

Security Compliance — Defined

Security compliance, on the other hand, refers to the adherence to laws, regulations, and industry standards related to cybersecurity. It involves meeting specific requirements set by external bodies, such as government agencies or industry associations. Security compliance aims to avoid legal penalties and fines that can result from non-compliance.

Purpose

The main purpose of security compliance is to adhere to cybersecurity laws, regulations, and industry standards. This could include things like the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for organizations that handle credit card transactions or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for healthcare organizations.

Meeting these requirements helps organizations avoid legal penalties and fines that can result from non-compliance. It also demonstrates to customers and other stakeholders that the organization is taking the necessary steps to protect sensitive information and maintain a secure environment.

Key Differences: Security Risk Management & Compliance

Despite serving similar purposes, security risk management and compliance have several key differences. One of the main differences is the focus of each approach. Security risk management is proactive, focusing on identifying and mitigating potential threats before they occur. Conversely, compliance is reactive, focusing on meeting specific requirements set by external bodies.

Another key difference is the process involved in each approach. Security risk management involves conducting a risk assessment to identify potential vulnerabilities and then implementing a risk management plan to address those vulnerabilities. 

Compliance, on the other hand, is concerned with meeting specific requirements set by external bodies. This could involve implementing specific controls or procedures or providing documentation to demonstrate compliance.

The Phoenix Security platform is a great tool for security risk management because it helps organizations analyze and contextualize potential threats across their attack surfaces. By taking data from security scanners and contextualizing, correlating, and prioritizing it, the platform offers a clear understanding of the actions that need to be taken to mitigate potential risks.

One of the key benefits of the Phoenix Security platform is that it provides a comprehensive view of an organization’s security posture. By analyzing data from multiple sources, it is able to identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize them based on their likelihood and impact. 

Phoenix Security — A Complete Security Risk Management Solution

Phoenix Security is a platform for security risk management because it helps organizations analyze and contextualize potential threats across their attack surfaces. By taking data from security scanners and contextualizing, correlating, and prioritizing it, the platform offers a clear understanding of the actions that need to be taken to mitigate potential risks.

One of the key benefits of the Phoenix Security platform is that it provides a comprehensive view of an organization’s security posture. By analyzing data from multiple sources, it is able to identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize them based on their likelihood and impact. 

Another advantage of the Phoenix Security platform is its ability to contextualize threats. By understanding the context in which a threat occurs, organizations are better able to understand the motivations behind an attack and the potential consequences of a breach. 

Bottom Line

Both security risk management and compliance are important for the overall security of an organization. Security risk management helps identify and mitigate potential threats, while compliance ensures that an organization is adhering to relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards. 

It is important for organizations to understand the differences between the two and implement both to protect against potential threats and maintain a secure environment effectively.

Sally is one of the expert content writers at Phoenix Security and a relationship manager Sally has been studying infosec and comes from a self-trained field with a passion for cybersecurity and application security.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
The team at Phoenix Security pleased to bring you another set of new application security (ASPM) features and improvements for vulnerability management across application and cloud security engines. This release builds on top of previous releases with key additions and progress across multiple areas of the platform. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Enhancements • New Weighted Asset Risk Formula – Refined risk aggregation for tailored vulnerability management. • Auto-Approval of Risk Exceptions – Accelerate mitigation by automating security approvals. • Enhanced Risk Explorer & Business Unit Insights – Monitor and analyze risk exposure by business units for better prioritization. Vulnerability & Asset Management • Link Findings to Existing Tickets – Seamless GitHub, ServiceNow, and Azure DevOps integration. • Multi-Finding Ticketing for ADO – Group multiple vulnerabilities in a single ticket for better workflow management. • Filter by Business Unit, CWE, Ownership, and Deployment Environment – Target vulnerabilities with precision using advanced filtering. Cyber Threat Intelligence & Security Enhancements • Cyber Threat Intelligence Premium – Access 128,000+ exploits for better exploitability and fixability metrics. • SBOM, Container SBOM & Open Source Artifact Analysis – Conduct deep security analysis with reachability insights. • Enhanced Lacework Container Management – Fetch and analyze running container details for better security reporting. • REST API Enhancements – Use asset tags for automated deployments and streamline security processes. Other Key Updates • CVE & CWE Columns Added – Compare vulnerabilities more effectively. • Custom Status Management for Findings – Personalize security workflows with custom status configurations. • Impact & Risk Explorer Side Panel – Gain heatmap-based insights into vulnerability distribution and team risk impact. 🚀 Stay ahead of vulnerabilities, optimize risk assessment, and enhance security efficiency with Phoenix Security’s latest features! 🚀
Alfonso Eusebio
Discover CVE-2025-30066 tj-actions/changed-files GitHub Action has been compromised, exposing secrets in CI/CD pipelines and posing a major software supply chain security risk. Attackers injected malicious code into all versions (V1–V45), repointing existing tags to a compromised commit that exfiltrated credentials via GitHub Actions logs. Immediate remediation is required—organizations must scan their repositories, rotate secrets, and replace the action to mitigate risk. Learn how Phoenix Security’s ASPM can automate threat detection and enhance GitHub Actions security.
Francesco Cipollone
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO