Is Open Source Secure?

The term open source can be found labeled on various hardware and software products throughout the computing landscape. What does the term open source even mean? 

Open source refers to products whose creator permits everyone to use, sell, modify, and distribute the original source code, design documents, and product content. Numerous libraries and projects exist which may be included in any application for use as their utility are unquestionable. Their reduction of development time and costs makes open source components here to stay. This is not without risk. However, bugs are a common occurrence in all applications and software, and the use of open-source libraries in applications can cause security loopholes that can be exploited.

What are some of these security vulnerabilities in open-source software? Some of the critical security vulnerabilities faced by open source components are:

Varying quality of code

In terms of development, it is possible to create something that works but is not developed correctly. Industry-standard development practices seek to streamline the application development lifecycle using reusable patterns to solve commonly occurring problems in the programming landscape. This is done to improve the performance and security of the final application. Different developers create a situation of uneven code due to varying levels of adherence to industry standards. This creates vulnerabilities in the final application should a component with security vulnerabilities be used.

Difficulty Managing Licenses

Proprietary software comes with numerous open source components. These components, being released under different licenses, make them difficult when it comes to licensing management. The frequency with which companies develop and release software and the existence of more than 300 open source licenses makes updating licenses challenging. This, coupled with the need to comply with all the individual license terms, makes using open source components costly.

Developer malpractice

Some security risks arise from developers’ malpractice. This is when the developer copies and uses code from open source libraries. This creates a loophole for the transfer of security applications between applications. It is also impossible to track and add a code snippet from the application, making it susceptible later.

Publicity of Exploits

The way open source works is that the code is made available to everybody. This allows the community to flag any potential exploits they may encounter in the code, allowing the project managers time to fix the vulnerabilities. However, these vulnerabilities are made publicly available through the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) for anyone to view. Malicious parties can use this information by targeting organizations that are slow to implement patches on their projects, relying on open-source components.

IS SECURITY TESTING THE ANSWER?

In light of all these potential security challenges, how do you address the need for open source components in software and web applications?  The alternative would be a commercial license. Commercial software is any software developed and designed for licensing or sale to end-users. The owners still retain ownership of the original code but allow its use at a cost. Though no solution addresses all these flaws, a possible solution lies in security testing. What is security testing? Security testing is testing software applications to detect and resolve security threats, vulnerabilities, and risks. This is in order to prevent exploitation of these vulnerabilities by malicious intruders.

What are the main types of security testing, you may ask? There are seven main types of security testing:

Vulnerability Scanning: The automated testing of software using software to detect known vulnerability signatures.

Security Scanning: This can be a manual or automated check to identify system and network weaknesses

Penetration testing: This is a kind of testing that simulates a real-life attempt at compromising the application. This testing analyses a specific system to check for vulnerabilities against a hacking attempt.

Risk Assessment: This analysis focuses on the organization’s security risks, with the results recommending solutions based on the threat level. Threats are classified as either low, medium, or high.

Security Auditing: This step checks internal applications and operating systems for security flaws. This can be done via a line by line inspection of code.

Ethical Hacking: This is hacking carried out on the contract by the organization in an attempt to discover hidden security flaws in their application.

Posture assessment: This step combines security scanning, ethical hacking, and risk assessments to show the posture of the company’s security.

Advantages of Security Testing

Some of the advantages of carrying out security testing of an application include:

-Security testing allows for the early detection of flaws in client applications. This prevents potential losses to the organization should the application be compromised.

-Bugs and flaws can be fixed quickly before launch. Using security testing, it is much easier to trace the source of security flaws in an application as security testing should occur in all code integration levels.

Disadvantages

-Security testing is not always effective as bugs can get past rigorous security checks. There is no guarantee that security testing will make your application 100% secure.

-The additional time and labour required to implement adequate security testing in an application entirely might hinder its full adoption in some cases. Small organizations struggle with implementing security testing practices as they cannot cover their cost and is therefore earmarked as optional.

-Security testing relies on known vulnerabilities, and the occurrence of a new unknown security flaw in an application source code would be able to get past the screening process. This can prove catastrophic to the organization should the vulnerability be known and exploited by malicious persons.

Conclusion

While it is undeniable that open source software serves its purpose and serves it well, it has become apparent that the potential security flaws resulting from their use need to be looked at in some cases. Open-source libraries are publicly accessible, and they are sometimes necessary for application development should an alternative be lacking. A lot of research needs to be carried out in order to resolve the highlighted security flaws.

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO