Application Security Training

AppSec Phoenix Training
AppSec Phoenix Training
AppSec Phoenix about to introduce the Training Modules

In an increasingly connected digital world, security is becoming an increasingly unavoidable obstacle to data security. The discovery of new attack vectors and the variety of malicious programs and users makes implementing a security policy only the first step in ensuring data security. It has also become apparent that members of staff need appropriate training in order to handle these challenges. Employees need to be prepared on how to deal with a security breach and its effects. This is where application security training comes in.

What is application security training? Security training is the pre-emptive act of carrying out exercises and drills in order to equip employees with the skills necessary to deal with and mitigate security vulnerabilities. Security training is carried out after creating security policies and is intended to familiarise the employees with what needs to be done while under different situations.

Application security training is used to equip developers on how to create applications that address security concerns. This makes the developers aware of design patterns and components that may pose a security risk to the final application. Its importance cannot be overstated. The increasing amount of data being entrusted to web applications make it a priority to defend. Why is it so important?

Reduction in errors

Studies have shown that a significant number of breaches occur as a result of employee carelessness. Through application security training, the employees can become aware of common threat vectors used to target them. An employee is less likely to click on or open email attachments after learning about common scams such as phishing emails and malware design patterns. The application developers would also learn new threat vectors and mitigation strategies in the program development life cycle.

Enhancement of Application security.

Through application security training, employees become more vigilant and adhere to existing security policies in the organization. Understanding the potential damage to the institution’s infrastructure should the system be breached, employees more submissive to policies that would otherwise be viewed as oppressive. Employees can also perform simple acts like using stringer passwords and flagging suspicious emails, which bolster an application’s security..

Savings on potential Losses.

While it is ultimately impossible to prevent security breaches, security training can help avoid losses arising from one. After proper training, an employee might encrypt their storage devices as a countermeasure against loss of privacy. This data could theoretically remain unaffected should their network be compromised. This saves money the organization would have spent replacing and or servicing affected computers.

Greater peace of mind

The existence of a strong security policy and security awareness training provides stakeholders with peace of mind. This is because they are aware that everyone is on the same page regarding securing the organization’s data.

WHAT IS CAPTURE THE FLAG?

Now that the importance of application security training has been established, how does one carry it out? No single answer for this exists, but one of the most effective is to capture the flag. Capture the flag has been used by security experts to test each other. The aim of capturing the flag is to promote problem-solving skills and team building. They are like computer security training where teams of competitors or individuals are pitted against each other. There are two types of capture the flag competitions, jeopardy and attack and defence capture the flag.

Jeopardy Capture the Flag.

This competition is very much like the game show jeopardy. The completion revolves around a set of challenges provided by the event organizers. Individuals then work on the challenges together. Each challenge is designed such that when solved, a flag is revealed, commonly text. This is then submitted to a scoring engine for points, with the points depending on the challenge’s difficulty. The contestants typically get about 72 hours to solve as many challenges as possible.

Attack and Defend capture the flag.

This type of capture the flag is rarely done for the public because of its complexity. In this competition, each team is given the same set of vulnerable server software. Each unit is to set up and audit the software before the competition. On the day of the competition, each team connects its servers to join an isolated network, which will be used for the competition. During the competition, the teams attempt to exploit vulnerabilities they found within the software in their competitors’ servers. They also have to patch their software to protect against the detected vulnerabilities. Points are awarded for extracting flags, properly defending their flags, and keeping their server under regular operation. The configuration of such a network and monitoring requires a lot of skilled labor, making this type of capture flag expensive to run. It is primarily because it is always carried out within the organization or less frequently jeopardized to capture the flag.

Jeopardy Capture the Flag.

This competition is very much like the game show jeopardy. The completion revolves around a set of challenges provided by the event organizers. Individuals then work on the challenges together. Each challenge is designed such that when solved, a flag is revealed, commonly text. This is then submitted to a scoring engine for points with the points depending on the difficulty of the challenge. The contestants typically get about 72 hours to solve as many challenges as possible. 

Attack and Defence capture the flag. 

This type of capture the flag is rarely done for the public because of its complexity. In this competition, each team is given the same set of vulnerable server software. Each unit is to set up and audit the software before the competition. On the day of the competition, each team connects its servers to join an isolated network, which will be used for the competition. During the competition, the teams attempt to exploit vulnerabilities they found within the software in their competitors’ servers. 

They also have to patch their software to protect against the detected vulnerabilities. Points are awarded for extracting flags, properly defending their flags, and keeping their server under regular operation. The configuration of such a network and monitoring requires a lot of skilled labour, making this type of capture flag expensive to run. It is primarily because it is always carried out within the organization or less frequently jeopardized to capture the flag.

Capturing the flag is considered one of the best ways to get started in cybersecurity. Despite the apparent initial difficulty, it has been credited with teaching individuals more about computing than any other method.  What are some of these advantages over other methods?

Capture the flag teaches hands-on cybersecurity skills that allow security professionals to stay up to date on the latest vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Due to computing’s forever evolving nature, this allows security professionals to keep up with emerging threats.

-Improves teamwork in organizations. Capture the flag forces people to work together, and this forces people to communicate and work together. This fosters collaboration in the organization and results in an overall increase in productivity among members of staff.

-Makes learning cybersecurity easier. Capture the flag gives practice forces practical application of computer skills. This has been proven to be more effective and creates a more practical security expert.

Application security training is essential for any organization’s security policy. By creating countermeasures and providing staff necessary skills and knowledge on cybersecurity, the organization is better prepared to deal with a breach should it arise. 

Phoenix Security also is introducing a great feature to enable teams to schedule self-paced training and link up the applications errors to the training so that the teams are positively nudged towards improving security. Get your demo today and chat with us on your appsec needs

Francesco is an internationally renowned public speaker, with multiple interviews in high-profile publications (eg. Forbes), and an author of numerous books and articles, who utilises his platform to evangelize the importance of Cloud security and cutting-edge technologies on a global scale.

Discuss this blog with our community on Slack

Join our AppSec Phoenix community on Slack to discuss this blog and other news with our professional security team

From our Blog

The journey of securing an organization’s application landscape varies dramatically, depending on where a company stands in its maturity. Early-stage startups with small security teams face challenges not only with vulnerabilities but also with scaling their security processes in line with their growth. On the flip side, established enterprises struggle with managing complex environments, prioritizing remediation, and dealing with vast amounts of vulnerabilities while staying ahead of sophisticated threats. For startups, the focus is clear—establish visibility and ensure core security practices are in place. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools provide a straightforward, automated approach to detecting vulnerabilities and enforcing policies. These solutions help reduce risk quickly without overburdening small security teams. Mature organizations, on the other hand, are tackling a different set of problems. With the sheer number of vulnerabilities and an increasingly complicated threat landscape, enterprises need to fine-tune their approach. The goal shifts toward intelligent remediation, leveraging real-time threat intelligence and advanced risk prioritization. ASPM tools at this stage do more than just detect vulnerabilities—they provide context, enable proactive decision-making, and streamline the entire remediation process. The emergence of AI-assisted code generation has further complicated security in both environments. These tools, while speeding up development, are often responsible for introducing new vulnerabilities into applications at a faster pace than traditional methods. The challenge is clear: AI-generated code can hide flaws that are difficult to catch in the rush of innovation. Both startups and enterprises need to adjust their security posture to account for these new risks. ASPM platforms, like Phoenix Security, provide automated scanning of code before it hits production, ensuring that flaws don’t make it past the first line of defense. Meanwhile, organizations are also grappling with the backlog crisis in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A staggering number of CVEs remain unprocessed, leaving many businesses with limited data on which to base their patching decisions. While these delays leave companies vulnerable, Phoenix Security steps in by cross-referencing CVE data with known exploits and live threat intelligence, helping organizations stay ahead despite the lag in official vulnerability reporting. Whether just starting their security program or managing a complex infrastructure, organizations need a toolset that adapts with them. Phoenix Security enables businesses of any size to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk, not just theoretical impact, helping security teams navigate the evolving threat landscape with speed and accuracy.
Francesco Cipollone
The cybersecurity world is reeling as MITRE’s funding for the CVE and NVD systems expires, disrupting the backbone of global vulnerability management. As traditional sources like the National Vulnerability Database collapse under funding cuts and submission backlogs, security teams face delays, incomplete data, and loss of automation in remediation pipelines. This isn’t just a data problem—it’s a structural crisis for application security and vulnerability correlation. In this landscape of uncertainty, Phoenix Security’s ASPM platform steps up with a code-to-cloud correlation engine that doesn’t depend on outdated data workflows. By connecting code-level insights (including tools like Semgrep) to runtime and cloud environments, Phoenix enables faster, context-aware vulnerability remediation—even as NVD and CVE pipelines deteriorate. This article dives into the implications of the CVE shutdown and how Phoenix Security is helping security and development teams transition to a resilient, correlation-first approach to cybersecurity.
Francesco Cipollone
Learn how to predict ransomware risks and vulnerability exploitation using a threat-centric approach. Explore data-driven insights, verified exploit trends, and methods for assessing the likelihood of attacks with key references to CISA KEV, EPSS, and Phoenix Security’s 4D Risk Formula.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
Remote Code Execution flaws continue to undermine Kubernetes ingress integrity. IngressNightmare (CVE-2025-1097, CVE-2025-1098, CVE-2025-24514, CVE-2025-1974) showcases severe threat vectors in NGINX-based proxies, leading to cluster-wide exposure. ASPM, robust remediation tactics, and strong application security solutions—like Phoenix Security—mitigate these vulnerabilities before ransomware groups exploit them.
Francesco Cipollone
The recent Google acquisition of Wiz for $32 billion has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity industry, particularly in the realm of Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). This monumental deal highlights the critical importance of cloud security and the growing demand for robust ASPM solutions. While the acquisition promises potential benefits for Google Cloud users, it also raises concerns about vendor lock-in and the future of cloud-agnostic security. Explore the implications of this acquisition and discover how neutral ASPM solutions like Phoenix Security can bridge the gap in multi-cloud environments, ensuring continuous, collaborative, and comprehensive security from code to cloud.” – Find Assets/Vulns by Scanner – Detailed findings Location information Risk-based Posture Management – Risk and Risk Magnitude for Assets – Filter assets and vulnerabilities by source scanner Integrations – BurpSuite XML Import – Assessment Import API Other Improvements – Improved multi-selection in filters – New CVSS Score column in Vulnerabilities
Alfonso Eusebio
Derek

Derek Fisher

Head of product security at a global fintech

Derek Fisher – Head of product security at a global fintech. Speaker, instructor, and author in application security.

Derek is an award winning author of a children’s book series in cybersecurity as well as the author of “The Application Security Handbook.” He is a university instructor at Temple University where he teaches software development security to undergraduate and graduate students. He is a speaker on topics in the cybersecurity space and has led teams, large and small, at organizations in the healthcare and financial industries. He has built and matured information security teams as well as implemented organizational information security strategies to reduce the organizations risk.

Derek got his start in the hardware engineering space where he learned about designing circuits and building assemblies for commercial and military applications. He later pursued a computer science degree in order to advance a career in software development. This is where Derek was introduced to cybersecurity and soon caught the bug. He found a mentor to help him grow in cybersecurity and then pursued a graduate degree in the subject.

Since then Derek has worked in the product security space as an architect and leader. He has led teams to deliver more secure software in organizations from multiple industries. His focus has been to raise the security awareness of the engineering organization while maintaining a practice of secure code development, delivery, and operations.

In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

Jeevan Singh

Jeevan Singh

Founder of Manicode Security

Jeevan Singh is the Director of Security Engineering at Rippling, with a background spanning various Engineering and Security leadership roles over the course of his career. He’s dedicated to the integration of security practices into software development, working to create a security-aware culture within organizations and imparting security best practices to the team.
In his role, Jeevan handles a range of tasks, from architecting security solutions to collaborating with Engineering Leadership to address security vulnerabilities at scale and embed security into the fabric of the organization.

James

James Berthoty

Founder of Latio Tech

James Berthoty has over ten years of experience across product and security domains. He founded Latio Tech to help companies find the right security tools for their needs without vendor bias.

christophe

Christophe Parisel

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Senior Cloud Security Architect

Chris

Chris Romeo

Co-Founder
Security Journey

Chris Romeo is a leading voice and thinker in application security, threat modeling, and security champions and the CEO of Devici and General Partner at Kerr Ventures. Chris hosts the award-winning “Application Security Podcast,” “The Security Table,” and “The Threat Modeling Podcast” and is a highly rated industry speaker and trainer, featured at the RSA Conference, the AppSec Village @ DefCon, OWASP Global AppSec, ISC2 Security Congress, InfoSec World and All Day DevOps. Chris founded Security Journey, a security education company, leading to an exit in 2022. Chris was the Chief Security Advocate at Cisco, spreading security knowledge through education and champion programs. Chris has twenty-six years of security experience, holding positions across the gamut, including application security, security engineering, incident response, and various Executive roles. Chris holds the CISSP and CSSLP certifications.

jim

Jim Manico

Founder of Manicode Security

Jim Manico is the founder of Manicode Security, where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. Jim is also the founder of Brakeman Security, Inc. and an investor/advisor for Signal Sciences. He is the author of Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications (McGraw-Hill), a frequent speaker on secure software practices, and a member of the JavaOne Rockstar speaker community. Jim is also a volunteer for and former board member of the OWASP foundation.

Join our Mailing list!

Get all the latest news, exclusive deals, and feature updates.

The IKIGAI concept
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO